|
|
|
|
LEADER |
03181nam a2200553Ia 4500 |
001 |
10.1093-ejo-cjx051 |
008 |
220706s2018 CNT 000 0 und d |
020 |
|
|
|a 01415387 (ISSN)
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Long-term (≥15 years) post-treatment changes and outcome quality after Class II:1 treatment in comparison to untreated Class i controls
|
260 |
|
0 |
|b Oxford University Press
|c 2018
|
856 |
|
|
|z View Fulltext in Publisher
|u https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjx051
|
520 |
3 |
|
|a Aim: To investigate the long-term (≥15 years) post-treatment (Tx) occlusal changes and outcome quality after Class II:1 Tx. Subjects and Methods: Herbst-MBA Tx had been performed at age 12.8 ± 2.7 years in 119 patients. A recall was conducted and study models from before and after active Tx, after retention as well as after recall were evaluated using standard occlusal variables and the PAR index. These data were compared to 31 untreated Class I controls. Results: 52 out of 119 patients could be located and participated at 33.6 ± 3.1 years. Compared to the 67 patients who did not participate in the recall, the pre- and post-Tx occlusal data of the participants did not differ systematically; however, the PAR scores were higher by 3.0-4.7 points at all times. Pre-Tx, the mean values of the 52 participants were: PAR = 27.2 ± 7.6, Class II molar relationship (MR) = 0.7 cusp widths (cw), overjet = 8.2 mm, overbite = 4.1 mm. After Tx, the PAR score was 3.4 ± 2.2. A Class I MR (0.0 ± 0.1 cw) with normal overjet (2.3 ± 0.7 mm) and overbite (1.3 ± 0.7 mm) existed. At recall, a mild PAR score increase to 8.2 ± 5.5 points had occurred; this was mainly due to increased overjet and overbite values (3.6 ± 1.1 and 2.8 ± 1.6 mm) while the MR was stable (0.0 ± 0.2 cw). For all these variables, similar findings were made in the untreated controls. Conclusion: The occlusal outcome of Class II:1 Tx showed very good long-term stability. While mild changes occur post-Tx, the long-term result is similar to untreated Class I controls. © The Author(s) 2017.
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a adolescent
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Adolescent
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a cephalometry
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Cephalometry
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a child
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Child
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Dental Occlusion
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a devices
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a female
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Female
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a follow up
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Follow-Up Studies
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a functional orthodontic appliance
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a human
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Humans
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a male
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Male
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a malocclusion
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Malocclusion, Angle Class I
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Malocclusion, Angle Class II
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Orthodontic Appliances, Functional
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a orthodontics
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Orthodontics, Corrective
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Overbite
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a pathology
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a procedures
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a tooth occlusion
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a treatment outcome
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Treatment Outcome
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Bock, N.C.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Evälahti, M.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Heikinheimo, K.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Hudel, H.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Rice, D.P.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Ruf, S.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Saffar, M.
|e author
|
773 |
|
|
|t European Journal of Orthodontics
|