|
|
|
|
LEADER |
03177nam a2200553Ia 4500 |
001 |
10.1093-scan-nsab041 |
008 |
220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d |
020 |
|
|
|a 17495016 (ISSN)
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a The relationship between childhood stress and distinct stages of dynamic behavior monitoring in adults: neural and behavioral correlates
|
260 |
|
0 |
|b Oxford University Press
|c 2021
|
856 |
|
|
|z View Fulltext in Publisher
|u https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsab041
|
520 |
3 |
|
|a Childhood adversity is a major risk factor for emotional and cognitive disorders later in adulthood. Behavior monitoring, one of the most important components of cognitive control, plays a crucial role in flexible interaction with the environment. Here, we test a novel conceptual model discriminating between two distinct dimensions of childhood adversity (i.e. deprivation and threat) and examine their relations to dynamic stages of behavior monitoring. Sixty young healthy adults participated in this study using event-related potentials and the dynamic stages of behavior monitoring including response inhibition, error detection and post-error adjustments were investigated in a classical Go/NoGo task. Multiple regression analyses revealed that participants with higher severity of childhood adversity recruited more controlled attention, as indicated by larger (more negative) conflict detection-related NoGo-N2 amplitudes and larger (more negative) error detection-related error-related negativity amplitudes. Higher severity of childhood abuse (an indicator of threat) was related to smaller (less positive) error appraisal-related error positivity amplitudes on the neural level and subsequently lower post-error accuracy on the behavioral level. These results suggested that prefrontal-supported controlled attention is influenced by universal adversity in childhood while the error-related behavioral adjustment is mainly affected by childhood abuse, indicating the dimensions of deprivation and threat are at least partially distinct. © 2021 The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press.
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a abuse
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a adult
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Adult
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a article
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a attention
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Attention
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a behavior monitoring
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a child
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Child
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a child abuse
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Child Abuse
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a childhood adversity
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a conceptual model
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a controlled study
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a electroencephalography
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Electroencephalography
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a ERP
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a error related negativity
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a event related potential
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Evoked Potentials
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a evoked response
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a female
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a human
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a human experiment
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Humans
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a male
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a multiple regression
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a neglect
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a neglect
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a physiological stress
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Duan, H.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Fang, H.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Kohn, N.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Liu, Y.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Qin, S.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Wu, J.
|e author
|
773 |
|
|
|t Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
|