Finding the Poor vs. Measuring Their Poverty: Exploring the Drivers of Targeting Effectiveness in Indonesia

Centralized targeting registries are increasingly used to allocate social assistance benefits in developing countries. There are two key design issues that matter for targeting accuracy: (i) which households to survey for inclusion in the registry; and (ii) how to rank surveyed households. We attemp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bah, A. (Author), Bazzi, S. (Author), Sumarto, S. (Author), Tobias, J. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02061nam a2200325Ia 4500
001 10.1093-wber-lhx020
008 220511s2019 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 02586770 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Finding the Poor vs. Measuring Their Poverty: Exploring the Drivers of Targeting Effectiveness in Indonesia 
260 0 |b Oxford University Press  |c 2019 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhx020 
520 3 |a Centralized targeting registries are increasingly used to allocate social assistance benefits in developing countries. There are two key design issues that matter for targeting accuracy: (i) which households to survey for inclusion in the registry; and (ii) how to rank surveyed households. We attempt to identify their relative importance by evaluating Indonesia's Unified Database for Social Protection Programs (UDB), among the largest targeting registries in the world, used to provide social assistance to over 25 million households. Linking administrative data with an independent household survey, we find that the UDB system is more progressive than previous, program-specific targeting approaches. However, simulating an alternative targeting system based on enumerating all households, we find a one-third reduction in undercoverage of the poor compared to focusing on households registered in the UDB. Overall, there are large gains in targeting performance from improving the initial registration stage relative to the ranking stage. © 2018 The Author(s). 
650 0 4 |a household survey 
650 0 4 |a Indonesia 
650 0 4 |a performance assessment 
650 0 4 |a policy approach 
650 0 4 |a poverty 
650 0 4 |a poverty 
650 0 4 |a proxy-means testing 
650 0 4 |a social protection 
650 0 4 |a social security 
650 0 4 |a socioeconomic survey 
650 0 4 |a targeting 
650 0 4 |a targeting 
650 0 4 |a welfare provision 
700 1 |a Bah, A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Bazzi, S.  |e author 
700 1 |a Sumarto, S.  |e author 
700 1 |a Tobias, J.  |e author 
773 |t World Bank Economic Review