In for a penny, in for a pound: examining motivated memory through the lens of retrieved context models

When people encounter items that they believe will help them gain reward, they later remember them better than others. A recent model of emotional memory, the emotional context maintenance and retrieval model (eCMR), predicts that these effects would be stronger when stimuli that predict high and lo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daw, N.D (Author), Kavaliauskaite, D. (Author), Talmi, D. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: NLM (Medline) 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02139nam a2200253Ia 4500
001 10.1101-lm.053470.121
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 15495485 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a In for a penny, in for a pound: examining motivated memory through the lens of retrieved context models 
260 0 |b NLM (Medline)  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.053470.121 
520 3 |a When people encounter items that they believe will help them gain reward, they later remember them better than others. A recent model of emotional memory, the emotional context maintenance and retrieval model (eCMR), predicts that these effects would be stronger when stimuli that predict high and low reward can compete with each other during both encoding and retrieval. We tested this prediction in two experiments. Participants were promised £1 for remembering some pictures, but only a few pence for remembering others. Their recall of the content of the pictures they saw was tested after 1 min and, in experiment 2, also after 24 h. Memory at the immediate test showed effects of list composition. Recall of stimuli that predicted high reward was greater than of stimuli that predicted lower reward, but only when high- and low-reward items were studied and recalled together, not when they were studied and recalled separately. More high-reward items in mixed lists were forgotten over a 24-h retention interval compared with items studied in other conditions, but reward did not modulate the forgetting rate, a null effect that should be replicated in a larger sample. These results confirm eCMR's predictions, although further research is required to compare that model against alternatives. © 2021 Talmi et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. 
650 0 4 |a emotion 
650 0 4 |a Emotions 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a Mental Recall 
650 0 4 |a recall 
650 0 4 |a reward 
650 0 4 |a Reward 
700 1 |a Daw, N.D.  |e author 
700 1 |a Kavaliauskaite, D.  |e author 
700 1 |a Talmi, D.  |e author 
773 |t Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)