Fully-Automated Spike Detection and Dipole Analysis of Epileptic MEG Using Deep Learning

• Main Authors: Asai, M. (Author), Emura, T. (Author), Hirano, R. (Author), Hirata, M. (Author), Kagitani-Shimono, K. (Author), Kishima, H. (Author), Nakashima, T. (Author), Nakata, O. (Author)
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 2022
• Subjects: Automation; Brain mapping; Classification networks; Cost effectiveness; Deep learning; Dipole analysis; Epilepsy; Equivalent current dipole; Estimation; Fully automated; Image segmentation; Images segmentations; Magnetoencephalography; Magnetoencephalography (MEG); Neurology; Semantic Segmentation; Semantics; Sensors; Spike detection; Training data
• Online Access: View Fulltext in Publisher

 Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a useful tool for clinically evaluating the localization of interictal spikes. Neurophysiologists visually identify spikes from the MEG waveforms and estimate the equivalent current dipoles (ECD). However, presently, these analyses are manually performed by neurophysiologists and are time-consuming. Another problem is that spike identification from MEG waveforms largely depends on neurophysiologists’ skills and experiences. These problems cause poor cost-effectiveness in clinical MEG examination. To overcome these problems, we fully automated spike identification and ECD estimation using a deep learning approach fully automated AI-based MEG interictal epileptiform discharge identification and ECD estimation (FAMED). We applied a semantic segmentation method, which is an image processing technique, to identify the appropriate times between spike onset and peak and to select appropriate sensors for ECD estimation. FAMED was trained and evaluated using clinical MEG data acquired from 375 patients. FAMED training was performed in two stages: in the first stage, a classification network was learned, and in the second stage, a segmentation network that extended the classification network was learned. The classification network had a mean AUC of 0.9868 (10-fold patient-wise cross-validation); the sensitivity and specificity were 0.7952 and 0.9971, respectively. The median distance between the ECDs estimated by the neurophysiologists and those using FAMED was 0.63 cm. Thus, the performance of FAMED is comparable to that of neurophysiologists, and it can contribute to the efficiency and consistency of MEG ECD analysis. Author