Sticking points: common-agency problems and contracting in the US healthcare system

We propose a “common-agency” model for explaining inefficient contracting in the US healthcare system. Common-agency problems arise when multiple payers seek to motivate a provider to invest in improved care coordination. We highlight the possibility of “sticking points,” that is, Pareto-dominated e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frandsen, B. (Author), Powell, M. (Author), Rebitzer, J.B (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc. 2019
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 01343nam a2200157Ia 4500
001 10.1111-1756-2171.12269
008 220511s2019 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 07416261 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Sticking points: common-agency problems and contracting in the US healthcare system 
260 0 |b Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.  |c 2019 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12269 
520 3 |a We propose a “common-agency” model for explaining inefficient contracting in the US healthcare system. Common-agency problems arise when multiple payers seek to motivate a provider to invest in improved care coordination. We highlight the possibility of “sticking points,” that is, Pareto-dominated equilibria in which payers coordinate around contracts which give weak incentives to the provider. Sticking points rationalize three hard-to-explain features of the US healthcare system: widespread fee-for-service arrangements; problematic care coordination; and the historical reliance on single-specialty practices to deliver care. The model also analyzes the effects of policies promoting more efficient contracting between payers and providers. © 2019, The RAND Corporation. 
700 1 |a Frandsen, B.  |e author 
700 1 |a Powell, M.  |e author 
700 1 |a Rebitzer, J.B.  |e author 
773 |t RAND Journal of Economics