Effects of chelating agent and acids on Biodentine

Background: To evaluate the effect of distilled water, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), phosphoric acid and maleic acid on Biodentine regarding surface topography, microhardness and push-out bond strength (POBS). Methods: Fifty-two cylindrical shaped Biodentine specimens were divided into gro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ballal, V. (Author), Campos, C.N (Author), Lima, C.O (Author), Marques, J.N (Author), Prado, M. (Author), Simão, R.A (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Blackwell Publishing 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 03013nam a2200589Ia 4500
001 10.1111-adj.12609
008 220706s2018 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 00450421 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Effects of chelating agent and acids on Biodentine 
260 0 |b Blackwell Publishing  |c 2018 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12609 
520 3 |a Background: To evaluate the effect of distilled water, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), phosphoric acid and maleic acid on Biodentine regarding surface topography, microhardness and push-out bond strength (POBS). Methods: Fifty-two cylindrical shaped Biodentine specimens were divided into groups: control (distilled water); EDTA (17% EDTA); PA (37% phosphoric acid); and MA (7% maleic acid). Surfaces were evaluated by topographic analysis and Vickers microhardness test. Topographic changes were evaluated qualitatively and microhardness was statistically analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test. Forty mandibular molars were used to simulate clinical conditions. The crowns were removed and a perforation was created at the furcal floor. The Biodentine was packed into the root perforations and the roots were divided into four groups (DW, EDTA, PA, MA). Samples were stored and subjected to interfacial analysis. POBS data were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn tests. Results: Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, MA and PA changed the morphology of the Biodentine surface. PA showed microhardness similar to distilled water (P > 0.05), while MA and EDTA demonstrated reduced values when compared with PA (P < 0.05). PA improved the POBS of Biodentine in comparison with the control. Conclusions: Changes in the topography, microhardness and POBS of Biodentine are associated with irrigant agent used. © 2018 Australian Dental Association 
650 0 4 |a Acids 
650 0 4 |a Biodentine 
650 0 4 |a Calcium Compounds 
650 0 4 |a calcium derivative 
650 0 4 |a chelating agent 
650 0 4 |a chelating agents 
650 0 4 |a Chelating Agents 
650 0 4 |a chemistry 
650 0 4 |a Crowns 
650 0 4 |a dental procedure 
650 0 4 |a Dental Stress Analysis 
650 0 4 |a dentin 
650 0 4 |a Dentin 
650 0 4 |a drug effect 
650 0 4 |a edetic acid 
650 0 4 |a Edetic Acid 
650 0 4 |a hardness 
650 0 4 |a Hardness 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a interfacial analysis 
650 0 4 |a Maleates 
650 0 4 |a maleic acid 
650 0 4 |a maleic acid derivative 
650 0 4 |a materials testing 
650 0 4 |a Materials Testing 
650 0 4 |a phosphoric acid 
650 0 4 |a Phosphoric Acids 
650 0 4 |a silicate 
650 0 4 |a Silicates 
650 0 4 |a surface 
650 0 4 |a tooth crown 
650 0 4 |a tricalcium silicate 
700 1 |a Ballal, V.  |e author 
700 1 |a Campos, C.N.  |e author 
700 1 |a Lima, C.O.  |e author 
700 1 |a Marques, J.N.  |e author 
700 1 |a Prado, M.  |e author 
700 1 |a Simão, R.A.  |e author 
773 |t Australian Dental Journal