The LEDs move pilot study: the Light Curtain and physical activity and well-being among people with visual and intellectual disabilities

Background: Moving around and being physically active can often be challenging for people with a visual impairment. The combination of a visual and intellectual disability can make being physically active even more difficult. The aim of the current study was to examine whether a technological device...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barakova, E. (Author), Enkelaar, L. (Author), Nijhof, N. (Author), Oosterom-Calo, R. (Author), Sterkenburg, P. (Author), Zhou, D. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: John Wiley and Sons Inc 2021
Subjects:
age
sex
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 03616nam a2200661Ia 4500
001 10.1111-jir.12882
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 09642633 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a The LEDs move pilot study: the Light Curtain and physical activity and well-being among people with visual and intellectual disabilities 
260 0 |b John Wiley and Sons Inc  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12882 
520 3 |a Background: Moving around and being physically active can often be challenging for people with a visual impairment. The combination of a visual and intellectual disability can make being physically active even more difficult. The aim of the current study was to examine whether a technological device for physical activity promotion would be associated with more movement and whether using it would be experienced as enjoyable for people with visual and intellectual disabilities. Methods: A randomised multiple baseline design was used for this study. The participants were nine adults with a visual impairment and an IQ between 20 and 50. As participants interacted with the Light Curtain, movement was measured with triaxial accelerometers embedded in the Empatica E4 wristband. Independent observers scored activity, alertness and well-being from video-recordings using the following observation lists: the Happiness Feature Score (HFS) and the Arousal and Valence Scale (AVS). Results: Physical activity measured with the accelerometer and positive excitement measured with the AVS significantly increased among participants when they were engaged with the Light Curtain compared with care-as-usual activities. Well-being measured with the HFS did not show a significant difference between the baseline and intervention phases. Conclusions: Engagement with the Light Curtain increased physical activity and positive excitement in persons with visual and intellectual disabilities, but more research is necessary to understand how the Light Curtain might affect happiness and well-being. © 2021 MENCAP and International Association of the Scientific Study of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 
650 0 4 |a acceleration 
650 0 4 |a accelerometry 
650 0 4 |a adult 
650 0 4 |a Adult 
650 0 4 |a age 
650 0 4 |a aged 
650 0 4 |a alertness 
650 0 4 |a Arousal and Valence Scale 
650 0 4 |a Article 
650 0 4 |a body movement 
650 0 4 |a clinical article 
650 0 4 |a disease severity 
650 0 4 |a exercise 
650 0 4 |a Exercise 
650 0 4 |a female 
650 0 4 |a general health status assessment 
650 0 4 |a happiness 
650 0 4 |a Happiness Feature Score 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a intellectual disability 
650 0 4 |a Intellectual Disability 
650 0 4 |a intellectual impairment 
650 0 4 |a intelligence quotient 
650 0 4 |a light curtain 
650 0 4 |a male 
650 0 4 |a middle aged 
650 0 4 |a outcome assessment 
650 0 4 |a physical activity 
650 0 4 |a physical activity 
650 0 4 |a Pilot Projects 
650 0 4 |a pilot study 
650 0 4 |a sex 
650 0 4 |a technology 
650 0 4 |a videorecording 
650 0 4 |a visual impairment 
650 0 4 |a visual impairment 
650 0 4 |a wellbeing 
650 0 4 |a well-being 
700 1 |a Barakova, E.  |e author 
700 1 |a Enkelaar, L.  |e author 
700 1 |a Nijhof, N.  |e author 
700 1 |a Oosterom-Calo, R.  |e author 
700 1 |a Sterkenburg, P.  |e author 
700 1 |a Zhou, D.  |e author 
773 |t Journal of Intellectual Disability Research