The differential impact of interactions outside the organization on employee well-being

We examine two different perspectives of interactions outside the organization: the relational work design perspective and the emotional labour perspective. The relational work design perspective suggests that interactions outside the organization have favourable outcomes for employees, whereas the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bhave, D.P (Author), Halldórsson, F. (Author), Kim, E. (Author), Lefter, A.M (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: John Wiley and Sons Ltd. 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02789nam a2200397Ia 4500
001 10.1111-joop.12232
008 220511s2019 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 09631798 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a The differential impact of interactions outside the organization on employee well-being 
260 0 |b John Wiley and Sons Ltd.  |c 2019 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12232 
520 3 |a We examine two different perspectives of interactions outside the organization: the relational work design perspective and the emotional labour perspective. The relational work design perspective suggests that interactions outside the organization have favourable outcomes for employees, whereas the emotional labour perspective suggests that such interactions have adverse outcomes for employees. Our goal is to reconcile findings from these two research streams. In Study 1, using data from employees working in diverse occupations, we find that interactions outside the organization have a positive indirect effect on employee well-being via task significance, and a negative indirect effect on employee well-being via surface acting. In Study 2, using data collected across two time points, we replicate these findings. In Study 3, we further extend these results and illustrate that interactional autonomy and interactional complexity are influential moderators that shape the strength of the mediated relationships. Our results aid in reconciling and extending findings from two different research streams, and enhance our understanding of the role of interactions outside the organization. Practitioner points: Managers should consider that employees’ interactions outside the organization have the potential to improve their well-being. Organizations could redesign jobs to enable employees in customer-facing roles to have greater discretion in how they interact with their customers and also increase the variety of these interactions. © 2018 The British Psychological Society 
650 0 4 |a adverse outcome 
650 0 4 |a article 
650 0 4 |a emotion regulation 
650 0 4 |a emotional labour 
650 0 4 |a emotionality 
650 0 4 |a employee 
650 0 4 |a employee well-being 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a human experiment 
650 0 4 |a interactions outside the organization 
650 0 4 |a manager 
650 0 4 |a occupation 
650 0 4 |a organization 
650 0 4 |a outcome assessment 
650 0 4 |a physician 
650 0 4 |a relational work design 
650 0 4 |a surface acting 
650 0 4 |a task significance 
650 0 4 |a wellbeing 
700 1 |a Bhave, D.P.  |e author 
700 1 |a Halldórsson, F.  |e author 
700 1 |a Kim, E.  |e author 
700 1 |a Lefter, A.M.  |e author 
773 |t Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology