|
|
|
|
LEADER |
03311nam a2200649Ia 4500 |
001 |
10.1121-1.5126022 |
008 |
220511s2019 CNT 000 0 und d |
020 |
|
|
|a 00014966 (ISSN)
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Frequency-modulated up-chirps produce larger evoked responses than down-chirps in the big brown bat auditory brainstem
|
260 |
|
0 |
|b Acoustical Society of America
|c 2019
|
856 |
|
|
|z View Fulltext in Publisher
|u https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5126022
|
520 |
3 |
|
|a In many mammals, upward-sweeping frequency-modulated (FM) sounds (up-chirps) evoke larger auditory brainstem responses than downward-sweeping sounds (down-chirps). To determine if similar effects occur in FM echolocating bats, auditory evoked responses (AERs) in big brown bats in response to up-chirps and down-chirps at different chirp durations and levels were recorded. Even though down-chirps are the biologically relevant stimulus for big brown bats, up-chirps typically evoked larger peaks in the AER, but with some exceptions at the shortest chirp durations. The up-chirp duration that produced the largest AERs and the greatest differences between up-chirps and down-chirps varied between individual bats and stimulus levels. Cross-covariance analyses using the entire AER waveform confirmed that amplitudes were typically larger to up-chirps than down-chirps at supra-threshold levels, with optimal durations around 0.5-1 ms. Changes in response latencies with stimulus levels were consistent with previous estimates of amplitude-latency trading. Latencies tended to decrease with increasing up-chirp duration and increase with increasing down-chirp duration. The effects of chirp direction on AER waveforms are generally consistent with those seen in other mammals but with small differences in response patterns that may reflect specializations for FM echolocation. © 2019 Acoustical Society of America.
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a animal
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Animals
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a article
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Auditory brainstem response
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a auditory evoked potential
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Auditory evoked response
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a auditory threshold
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Auditory Threshold
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a bat
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Brain
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a brain stem
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a brain stem
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Brain Stem
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Chiroptera
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Chirp modulation
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a covariance
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Cross-covariance
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a echolocation
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a evoked brain stem auditory response
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Evoked response
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Frequency modulated
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Frequency modulation
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a mammal
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Mammals
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a nonhuman
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a physiology
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a pitch perception
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Pitch Perception
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a reaction time
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Response patterns
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Sonar
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a specialization
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Sweeping frequencies
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Threshold levels
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a vocalization
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Vocalization, Animal
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a waveform
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Beck, Q.M.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Luo, J.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Macías, S.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Moss, C.F.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Simmons, A.M.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Simmons, J.A.
|e author
|
773 |
|
|
|t Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|