Optimizing non-invasive functional markers for cochlear deafferentation based on electrocochleography and auditory brainstem responses

Accumulating evidence suggests that cochlear deafferentation may contribute to suprathreshold deficits observed with or without elevated hearing thresholds, and can lead to accelerated age-related hearing loss. Currently there are no clinical diagnostic tools to detect human cochlear deafferentation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bao, J. (Author), Harris, K.C (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: NLM (Medline) 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02580nam a2200325Ia 4500
001 10.1121-10.0010317
008 220510s2022 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 15208524 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Optimizing non-invasive functional markers for cochlear deafferentation based on electrocochleography and auditory brainstem responses 
260 0 |b NLM (Medline)  |c 2022 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0010317 
520 3 |a Accumulating evidence suggests that cochlear deafferentation may contribute to suprathreshold deficits observed with or without elevated hearing thresholds, and can lead to accelerated age-related hearing loss. Currently there are no clinical diagnostic tools to detect human cochlear deafferentation in vivo. Preclinical studies using a combination of electrophysiological and post-mortem histological methods clearly demonstrate cochlear deafferentation including myelination loss, mitochondrial damages in spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs), and synaptic loss between inner hair cells and SGNs. Since clinical diagnosis of human cochlear deafferentation cannot include post-mortem histological quantification, various attempts based on functional measurements have been made to detect cochlear deafferentation. So far, those efforts have led to inconclusive results. Two major obstacles to the development of in vivo clinical diagnostics include a lack of standardized methods to validate new approaches and characterize the normative range of repeated measurements. In this overview, we examine strategies from previous studies to detect cochlear deafferentation from electrocochleography and auditory brainstem responses. We then summarize possible approaches to improve these non-invasive functional methods for detecting cochlear deafferentation with a focus on cochlear synaptopathy. We identify conceptual approaches that should be tested to associate unique electrophysiological features with cochlear deafferentation. 
650 0 4 |a Audiometry, Evoked Response 
650 0 4 |a auditory threshold 
650 0 4 |a Auditory Threshold 
650 0 4 |a cochlea 
650 0 4 |a Cochlea 
650 0 4 |a evoked brain stem auditory response 
650 0 4 |a Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem 
650 0 4 |a evoked response audiometry 
650 0 4 |a hearing 
650 0 4 |a Hearing 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a physiology 
650 0 4 |a spiral ganglion 
650 0 4 |a Spiral Ganglion 
700 1 |a Bao, J.  |e author 
700 1 |a Harris, K.C.  |e author 
773 |t The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America