Augmented Visual Feedback: Cure or Distraction?

Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of augmented feedback on participants’ workload, performance, and distribution of visual attention. Background: An important question in human–machine interface design is whether the operator should be provided with direct solutions. We f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Borst, C. (Author), Eisma, Y.B (Author), Paassen, R.V (Author), Winter, J.D (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publications Inc. 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02747nam a2200445Ia 4500
001 10.1177-0018720820924602
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 00187208 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Augmented Visual Feedback: Cure or Distraction? 
260 0 |b SAGE Publications Inc.  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720820924602 
520 3 |a Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of augmented feedback on participants’ workload, performance, and distribution of visual attention. Background: An important question in human–machine interface design is whether the operator should be provided with direct solutions. We focused on the solution space diagram (SSD), a type of augmented feedback that shows directly whether two aircraft are on conflicting trajectories. Method: One group of novices (n = 13) completed conflict detection tasks with SSD, whereas a second group (n = 11) performed the same tasks without SSD. Eye-tracking was used to measure visual attention distribution. Results: The mean self-reported task difficulty was substantially lower for the SSD group compared to the No-SSD group. The SSD group had a better conflict detection rate than the No-SSD group, whereas false-positive rates were equivalent. High false-positive rates for some scenarios were attributed to participants who misunderstood the SSD. Compared to the No-SSD group, the SSD group spent a large proportion of their time looking at the SSD aircraft while looking less at other areas of interest. Conclusion: Augmented feedback makes the task subjectively easier but has side effects related to visual tunneling and misunderstanding. Application: Caution should be exercised when human operators are expected to reproduce task solutions that are provided by augmented visual feedback. © Copyright 2020, The Author(s). 
650 0 4 |a Aircraft 
650 0 4 |a Augmented feedback 
650 0 4 |a Behavioral research 
650 0 4 |a Conflict detection 
650 0 4 |a Direct solution 
650 0 4 |a Eye tracking 
650 0 4 |a eye-tracking 
650 0 4 |a False positive rates 
650 0 4 |a Feedback 
650 0 4 |a feedback system 
650 0 4 |a Feedback, Sensory 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a human–machine interfaces 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a Machine interfaces 
650 0 4 |a sensory feedback 
650 0 4 |a Task difficulty 
650 0 4 |a visual attention 
650 0 4 |a Visual Attention 
650 0 4 |a Visual communication 
650 0 4 |a Visual feedback 
650 0 4 |a workload 
650 0 4 |a Workload 
700 1 |a Borst, C.  |e author 
700 1 |a Eisma, Y.B.  |e author 
700 1 |a Paassen, R.V.  |e author 
700 1 |a Winter, J.D.  |e author 
773 |t Human Factors