Age of sign language acquisition has lifelong effect on syntactic preferences in sign language users

Acquisition of natural language has been shown to fundamentally impact both one’s ability to use the first language and the ability to learn subsequent languages later in life. Sign languages offer a unique perspective on this issue because Deaf signers receive access to signed input at varying ages...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Krebs, J. (Author), Malaia, E.A (Author), Roehm, D. (Author), Wilbur, R.B (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publications Ltd 2021
Subjects:
age
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02372nam a2200349Ia 4500
001 10.1177-0165025420958193
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 01650254 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Age of sign language acquisition has lifelong effect on syntactic preferences in sign language users 
260 0 |b SAGE Publications Ltd  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025420958193 
520 3 |a Acquisition of natural language has been shown to fundamentally impact both one’s ability to use the first language and the ability to learn subsequent languages later in life. Sign languages offer a unique perspective on this issue because Deaf signers receive access to signed input at varying ages. The majority acquires sign language in (early) childhood, but some learn sign language later—a situation that is drastically different from that of spoken language acquisition. To investigate the effect of age of sign language acquisition and its potential interplay with age in signers, we examined grammatical acceptability ratings and reaction time measures in a group of Deaf signers (age range = 28–58 years) with early (0–3 years) or later (4–7 years) acquisition of sign language in childhood. Behavioral responses to grammatical word order variations (subject–object–verb [SOV] vs. object–subject–verb [OSV]) were examined in sentences that included (1) simple sentences, (2) topicalized sentences, and (3) sentences involving manual classifier constructions, uniquely characteristic of sign languages. Overall, older participants responded more slowly. Age of acquisition had subtle effects on acceptability ratings, whereby the direction of the effect depended on the specific linguistic structure. © The Author(s) 2020. 
650 0 4 |a adult 
650 0 4 |a age 
650 0 4 |a Age of acquisition 
650 0 4 |a article 
650 0 4 |a Austrian Sign Language 
650 0 4 |a child 
650 0 4 |a childhood 
650 0 4 |a classifier 
650 0 4 |a female 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a human experiment 
650 0 4 |a male 
650 0 4 |a reaction time 
650 0 4 |a sign language 
650 0 4 |a sign language 
700 1 |a Krebs, J.  |e author 
700 1 |a Malaia, E.A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Roehm, D.  |e author 
700 1 |a Wilbur, R.B.  |e author 
773 |t International Journal of Behavioral Development