Mediated phonological–semantic priming in spoken word production: Evidence for cascaded processing from picture–word interference

The cognitive architecture that allows humans to retrieve words from the mental lexicon has been investigated for decades. While there is consensus regarding a two-step architecture involving lexical-conceptual and phonological word-form levels of processing, accounts of how activation spreads betwe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: de Zubicaray, G. (Author), Kleinman, D. (Author), Mascelloni, M. (Author), McMahon, K.L (Author), Piai, V. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publications Ltd 2021
Subjects:
PWI
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 03077nam a2200373Ia 4500
001 10.1177-17470218211010591
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 17470218 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Mediated phonological–semantic priming in spoken word production: Evidence for cascaded processing from picture–word interference 
260 0 |b SAGE Publications Ltd  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218211010591 
520 3 |a The cognitive architecture that allows humans to retrieve words from the mental lexicon has been investigated for decades. While there is consensus regarding a two-step architecture involving lexical-conceptual and phonological word-form levels of processing, accounts of how activation spreads between them (e.g., in a serial, cascaded, or interactive fashion) remain contentious. In addition, production models differ with respect to whether selection occurs at lexical or postlexical levels. The purpose of this study was to examine whether mediated phonological–semantic relations (e.g., drip is phonologically related to drill that is semantically related to hammer) influence production in adults as predicted by models implementing cascaded processing and feedback between levels. Two experiments using the picture–word interference (PWI) paradigm were conducted using auditory (Exp. 1) and written (Exp. 2) distractors. We hypothesised that a mediated semantic interference effect would be observable in the former with the involvement of both spoken word production and recognition, and in the latter if lexical representations are shared between written and spoken words in English, as assumed by some production accounts. Furthermore, we hypothesised a mediated semantic interference effect would be inconsistent with a postlexical selection account as the distractors do not constitute a relevant response for the target picture (e.g., drip-HAMMER). We observed mediated semantic interference only from auditory distractors, while observing the standard semantic interference effect from both auditory and written distractors. The current findings represent the first chronometric evidence involving spoken word production and recognition in support of cascaded processing during lexical retrieval in adults and present a significant challenge for the postlexical selection account. © Experimental Psychology Society 2021. 
650 0 4 |a adult 
650 0 4 |a Adult 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a mediated semantic priming 
650 0 4 |a motor activity 
650 0 4 |a Motor Activity 
650 0 4 |a PWI 
650 0 4 |a reaction time 
650 0 4 |a Reaction Time 
650 0 4 |a semantic interference 
650 0 4 |a semantics 
650 0 4 |a Semantics 
650 0 4 |a speech 
650 0 4 |a Speech 
650 0 4 |a Speech production 
700 1 |a de Zubicaray, G.  |e author 
700 1 |a Kleinman, D.  |e author 
700 1 |a Mascelloni, M.  |e author 
700 1 |a McMahon, K.L.  |e author 
700 1 |a Piai, V.  |e author 
773 |t Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology