Modalities of using endodontic nickel-titanium rotary instruments and factors influencing their implementation in dental practice

Background: To establish the extent of using nickel titanium rotary instruments (NiTi-RIs), to identify reasons for using / not using NiTi-RIs, to explore usage modalities and to identify factors and measures that can increase implementation of NiTi-RIs in general dental practice. Methods: Two pilot...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Habib, A.A (Author), Madarati, A.A (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BioMed Central Ltd. 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 03473nam a2200529Ia 4500
001 10.1186-s12903-018-0660-x
008 220706s2018 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 14726831 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Modalities of using endodontic nickel-titanium rotary instruments and factors influencing their implementation in dental practice 
260 0 |b BioMed Central Ltd.  |c 2018 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0660-x 
520 3 |a Background: To establish the extent of using nickel titanium rotary instruments (NiTi-RIs), to identify reasons for using / not using NiTi-RIs, to explore usage modalities and to identify factors and measures that can increase implementation of NiTi-RIs in general dental practice. Methods: Two pilot questionnaires were conducted on academic staff members at College of Dentistry, Taibah University, general dentists (GDs) and endodontists to finalise the questionnaire. A sample size was calculated considering the expected and minimum accepted response rates (60 and 48%, respectively) and a 99.9% Confidence Level. The online-questionnaire was sent to 600 GDs and all endodontists (175) working in Saudi Arabia. A reminder was emailed after 10weeks to encourage non-respondents to complete the questionnaire. Responses, were collected and converted into numerical data which were analysed using the Chi-square test (p=0.05). Results: Significantly most respondents (71.9%) used NiTi-RIs (p<0.001); with more endodontists (96.9%) than GDs (60%). Most users (62.5%) had been using NiTi-RIs for More than 3years (p<0001). The trend of using NiTi-RIs increased as participants' experience and the number of root-canal treatments performed per week increased (p=0.021). While most respondents (45.3%) used NiTi-RIs because of faster root-canal preparation, the majority of non-users (85.3%) didn't do so because of high cost. The highest proportion (43.3%) reported better undergraduate education as the most important factor that can significantly increase NiTi-RIs usage. The majority (91.8%) prepared glide-path before using NiTi-RIs; especially with stainless steel hand-files (63.3%). Conclusions: NiTi-RIs are relatively well adopted in Saudi dental practice. However, better education, especially during undergraduate training and lower cost can increase their usage. Overall, clinicians showed good awareness of NiTi-RIs usage aspects which reflected on usage modalities. © 2018 The Author(s). 
650 0 4 |a Adoption 
650 0 4 |a alloy 
650 0 4 |a Alloys 
650 0 4 |a clinical practice 
650 0 4 |a dental device 
650 0 4 |a Dental Instruments 
650 0 4 |a dentist 
650 0 4 |a Dentists 
650 0 4 |a Endodontics 
650 0 4 |a endodontist 
650 0 4 |a Endodontists 
650 0 4 |a equipment design 
650 0 4 |a Equipment Design 
650 0 4 |a general practice 
650 0 4 |a General Practice, Dental 
650 0 4 |a Glide path 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a Modalities 
650 0 4 |a NiTi 
650 0 4 |a nitinol 
650 0 4 |a Pilot Projects 
650 0 4 |a pilot study 
650 0 4 |a Practice Patterns, Dentists' 
650 0 4 |a questionnaire 
650 0 4 |a Questionnaire 
650 0 4 |a Root canal 
650 0 4 |a Rotary files 
650 0 4 |a Saudi Arabia 
650 0 4 |a Survey 
650 0 4 |a Surveys and Questionnaires 
650 0 4 |a Uptake 
700 1 |a Habib, A.A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Madarati, A.A.  |e author 
773 |t BMC Oral Health