Closed-loop oxygen control improves oxygen therapy in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients under high flow nasal oxygen: a randomized cross-over study (the HILOOP study)

• Main Authors: Caritg, O. (Author), Ferrer, R. (Author), García-de-Acilu, M. (Author), Pacheco, A. (Author), Ramos, F.J (Author), Ricard, J.-D (Author), Roca, O. (Author), Santafé, M. (Author), Schultz, M.J (Author)
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BioMed Central Ltd 2022
• Subjects: Acute respiratory failure; adult; Adult; Automatic oxygen titration; cannula; Cannula; Closed-loop oxygen control; controlled study; COVID-19; crossover procedure; Cross-Over Studies; High flow nasal cannula; High-flow nasal oxygen; human; Humans; hypoxia; Hypoxia; Nasal high-flow; oxygen; Oxygen; Oxygen Inhalation Therapy; oxygen therapy; pandemic; Pandemics; procedures; randomized controlled trial; respiratory failure; Respiratory Insufficiency
• Online Access: View Fulltext in Publisher

 Background: We aimed to assess the efficacy of a closed-loop oxygen control in critically ill patients with moderate to severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) treated with high flow nasal oxygen (HFNO). Methods: In this single-centre, single-blinded, randomized crossover study, adult patients with moderate to severe AHRF who were treated with HFNO (flow rate ≥ 40 L/min with FiO2 ≥ 0.30) were randomly assigned to start with a 4-h period of closed-loop oxygen control or 4-h period of manual oxygen titration, after which each patient was switched to the alternate therapy. The primary outcome was the percentage of time spent in the individualized optimal SpO2 range. Results: Forty-five patients were included. Patients spent more time in the optimal SpO2 range with closed-loop oxygen control compared with manual titrations of oxygen (96.5 [93.5 to 98.9] % vs. 89 [77.4 to 95.9] %; p < 0.0001) (difference estimate, 10.4 (95% confidence interval 5.2 to 17.2). Patients spent less time in the suboptimal range during closed-loop oxygen control, both above and below the cut-offs of the optimal SpO2 range, and less time above the suboptimal range. Fewer number of manual adjustments per hour were needed with closed-loop oxygen control. The number of events of SpO2 < 88% and < 85% were not significantly different between groups. Conclusions: Closed-loop oxygen control improves oxygen administration in patients with moderate-to-severe AHRF treated with HFNO, increasing the percentage of time in the optimal oxygenation range and decreasing the workload of healthcare personnel. These results are especially relevant in a context of limited oxygen supply and high medical demand, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Trial registration The HILOOP study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov under the identifier NCT04965844. © 2022, The Author(s).