Enzymatic degradation of maize shoots: monitoring of chemical and physical changes reveals different saccharification behaviors

Background: The recalcitrance of lignocellulosics to enzymatic saccharification has been related to many factors, including the tissue and molecular heterogeneity of the plant particles. The role of tissue heterogeneity generally assessed from plant sections is not easy to study on a large scale. In...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barron, C. (Author), Bonnin, E. (Author), Devaux, M.-F (Author), Durand, S. (Author), Falourd, X. (Author), Foucat, L. (Author), Guillon, F. (Author), Joseph-Aime, M. (Author), Lapierre, C. (Author), Looten, R. (Author), Rouau, X. (Author), Saulnier, L. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BioMed Central Ltd 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 04606nam a2200745Ia 4500
001 10.1186-s13068-020-01854-1
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 17546834 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Enzymatic degradation of maize shoots: monitoring of chemical and physical changes reveals different saccharification behaviors 
260 0 |b BioMed Central Ltd  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-020-01854-1 
520 3 |a Background: The recalcitrance of lignocellulosics to enzymatic saccharification has been related to many factors, including the tissue and molecular heterogeneity of the plant particles. The role of tissue heterogeneity generally assessed from plant sections is not easy to study on a large scale. In the present work, dry fractionation of ground maize shoot was performed to obtain particle fractions enriched in a specific tissue. The degradation profiles of the fractions were compared considering physical changes in addition to chemical conversion. Results: Coarse, medium and fine fractions were produced using a dry process followed by an electrostatic separation. The physical and chemical characteristics of the fractions varied, suggesting enrichment in tissue from leaves, pith or rind. The fractions were subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis in a torus reactor designed for real-time monitoring of the number and size of the particles. Saccharification efficiency was monitored by analyzing the sugar release at different times. The lowest and highest saccharification yields were measured in the coarse and fine fractions, respectively, and these yields paralleled the reduction in the size and number of particles. The behavior of the positively- and negatively-charged particles of medium-size fractions was contrasted. Although the amount of sugar release was similar, the changes in particle size and number differed during enzymatic degradation. The reduction in the number of particles proceeded faster than that of particle size, suggesting that degradable particles were degraded to the point of disappearance with no significant erosion or fragmentation. Considering all fractions, the saccharification yield was positively correlated with the amount of water associated with [5–15 nm] pore size range at 67% moisture content while the reduction in the number of particles was inversely correlated with the amount of lignin. Conclusion: Real-time monitoring of sugar release and changes in the number and size of the particles clearly evidenced different degradation patterns for fractions of maize shoot that could be related to tissue heterogeneity in the plant. The biorefinery process could benefit from the addition of a sorting stage to optimise the flow of biomass materials and take better advantage of the heterogeneity of the biomass. © 2021, The Author(s). 
650 0 4 |a biomass 
650 0 4 |a Biomass saccharification 
650 0 4 |a cellulose 
650 0 4 |a Charged particles 
650 0 4 |a Degradation 
650 0 4 |a Degradation 
650 0 4 |a Degradation patterns 
650 0 4 |a Degradation profiles 
650 0 4 |a Electric Charge 
650 0 4 |a Electrostatic Separation 
650 0 4 |a Enzymatic Degradation 
650 0 4 |a Enzymatic hydrolysis 
650 0 4 |a Enzymatic saccharification 
650 0 4 |a enzyme activity 
650 0 4 |a Enzymolysis 
650 0 4 |a image analysis 
650 0 4 |a Image analysis 
650 0 4 |a Lignocellulosic 
650 0 4 |a maize 
650 0 4 |a Molecular heterogeneity 
650 0 4 |a particle size 
650 0 4 |a Particle size 
650 0 4 |a Particle Size 
650 0 4 |a Particles size 
650 0 4 |a Physical and chemical characteristics 
650 0 4 |a physicochemical property 
650 0 4 |a Plant dry fractionation 
650 0 4 |a Plants (botany) 
650 0 4 |a Pore size 
650 0 4 |a Pore Size 
650 0 4 |a Porosity 
650 0 4 |a Recalcitrance 
650 0 4 |a Saccharification 
650 0 4 |a Saccharification 
650 0 4 |a shoot 
650 0 4 |a Shotcreting 
650 0 4 |a Time-lapse study 
650 0 4 |a Tissue 
650 0 4 |a Tissue engineering 
650 0 4 |a Tissue heterogeneity 
700 1 |a Barron, C.  |e author 
700 1 |a Bonnin, E.  |e author 
700 1 |a Devaux, M.-F.  |e author 
700 1 |a Durand, S.  |e author 
700 1 |a Falourd, X.  |e author 
700 1 |a Foucat, L.  |e author 
700 1 |a Guillon, F.  |e author 
700 1 |a Joseph-Aime, M.  |e author 
700 1 |a Lapierre, C.  |e author 
700 1 |a Looten, R.  |e author 
700 1 |a Rouau, X.  |e author 
700 1 |a Saulnier, L.  |e author 
773 |t Biotechnology for Biofuels