Acupuncture for allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: In this study, we attempted to assess the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for allergic rhinitis (AR), and to test the robustness of the estimated effects. Methods: The Cochrane methodology standard was followed to conduct this systematic review. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) com...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: He, M. (Author), Qin, W. (Author), Qin, Z. (Author), Zhao, C. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BioMed Central Ltd 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 03048nam a2200481Ia 4500
001 10.1186-s40001-022-00682-3
008 220510s2022 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 09492321 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Acupuncture for allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis 
260 0 |b BioMed Central Ltd  |c 2022 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00682-3 
520 3 |a Background: In this study, we attempted to assess the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for allergic rhinitis (AR), and to test the robustness of the estimated effects. Methods: The Cochrane methodology standard was followed to conduct this systematic review. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing acupuncture with other therapies for AR were included. Furthermore, trial sequential analysis was conducted to test the robustness of pooled results. Thirty trials with 4413 participants were included. Results: Acupuncture improved the nasal symptoms on Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) and quality of life measured by Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) in adults with AR, compared to acupuncture with no intervention. Acupuncture was also shown to be more effective than sham acupuncture for nasal symptom (RQLQ subscale, n = 489, MD − 0.60, 95% CI − 1.16 to − 0.04) and quality of life (RQLQ, n = 248, − 8.47 95% CI − 14.91, − 2.03). No clear difference was observed between acupuncture and cetirizine or loratadine. Interestingly, trial sequential analysis (TSA) failed to confirm the aforementioned results. The effect of acupuncture for children/adolescents with AR remains unclear due to insufficient data. The performance bias and attrition bias are serious in most studies that were included. Selection bias may also have affected the quality of the evidence. Conclusion: Acupuncture may have an advantage over no intervention and sham acupuncture in improving nasal symptoms and quality of life for adults with AR. The effect of acupuncture and cetirizine or loratadine for AR may be similar. Additional trials are necessary to confirm these results. © 2022, The Author(s). 
650 0 4 |a acupuncture 
650 0 4 |a Acupuncture 
650 0 4 |a Acupuncture Therapy 
650 0 4 |a adolescent 
650 0 4 |a Adolescent 
650 0 4 |a adult 
650 0 4 |a Adult 
650 0 4 |a allergic rhinitis 
650 0 4 |a Allergic rhinitis 
650 0 4 |a cetirizine 
650 0 4 |a Cetirizine 
650 0 4 |a child 
650 0 4 |a Child 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a loratadine 
650 0 4 |a Loratadine 
650 0 4 |a meta analysis 
650 0 4 |a Meta-analysis 
650 0 4 |a procedures 
650 0 4 |a quality of life 
650 0 4 |a Quality of Life 
650 0 4 |a questionnaire 
650 0 4 |a Randomized controlled trials 
650 0 4 |a Rhinitis, Allergic 
650 0 4 |a Surveys and Questionnaires 
700 1 |a He, M.  |e author 
700 1 |a Qin, W.  |e author 
700 1 |a Qin, Z.  |e author 
700 1 |a Zhao, C.  |e author 
773 |t European Journal of Medical Research