Testing encoding specificity and the diagnostic feature-detection theory of eyewitness identification, with implications for showups, lineups, and partially disguised perpetrators

The diagnostic feature-detection theory (DFT) of eyewitness identification is based on facial information that is diagnostic versus non-diagnostic of suspect guilt. It primarily has been tested by discounting non-diagnostic information at retrieval, typically by surrounding a single suspect showup w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carlson, C.A (Author), Carlson, M.A (Author), Dias, J.L (Author), Hemby, J.A (Author), Jones, A.R (Author), Lockamyeir, R.F (Author), Whittington, J.E (Author), Wooten, A.R (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02649nam a2200385Ia 4500
001 10.1186-s41235-021-00276-3
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 23657464 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Testing encoding specificity and the diagnostic feature-detection theory of eyewitness identification, with implications for showups, lineups, and partially disguised perpetrators 
260 0 |b Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00276-3 
520 3 |a The diagnostic feature-detection theory (DFT) of eyewitness identification is based on facial information that is diagnostic versus non-diagnostic of suspect guilt. It primarily has been tested by discounting non-diagnostic information at retrieval, typically by surrounding a single suspect showup with good fillers to create a lineup. We tested additional DFT predictions by manipulating the presence of facial information (i.e., the exterior region of the face) at both encoding and retrieval with a large between-subjects factorial design (N = 19,414). In support of DFT and in replication of the literature, lineups yielded higher discriminability than showups. In support of encoding specificity, conditions that matched information between encoding and retrieval were generally superior to mismatch conditions. More importantly, we supported several DFT and encoding specificity predictions not previously tested, including that (a) adding non-diagnostic information will reduce discriminability for showups more so than lineups, and (b) removing diagnostic information will lower discriminability for both showups and lineups. These results have implications for police deciding whether to conduct a showup or a lineup, and when dealing with partially disguised perpetrators (e.g., wearing a hoodie). © 2021, The Author(s). 
650 0 4 |a Diagnostic feature-detection theory 
650 0 4 |a Encoding specificity 
650 0 4 |a Eyewitness identification 
650 0 4 |a guilt 
650 0 4 |a Guilt 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a methodology 
650 0 4 |a police 
650 0 4 |a Police 
650 0 4 |a Recognition, Psychology 
650 0 4 |a Research Design 
650 0 4 |a Showup 
650 0 4 |a Simultaneous lineup 
700 1 |a Carlson, C.A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Carlson, M.A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Dias, J.L.  |e author 
700 1 |a Hemby, J.A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Jones, A.R.  |e author 
700 1 |a Lockamyeir, R.F.  |e author 
700 1 |a Whittington, J.E.  |e author 
700 1 |a Wooten, A.R.  |e author 
773 |t Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications