Superimposed polygonal approximation analysis comparing 2D photography and 3D scanned images of bite marks on human skin

Background: Preservation of bite marks evidence has always been a major problem in forensic odontology due to progressive loss of details as time passes. The use of 2D photographs has been widely used to document forensic evidence and preserving bite marks; however, there are limitations to this met...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Azahar, N. (Author), Reduwan, N.H (Author), Rizwal, A.A (Author), Yusof, M.Y.P.M (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH 2021
Series:Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
View in Scopus
LEADER 02644nam a2200229Ia 4500
001 10.1186-s41935-021-00233-7
008 220121s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 2090536X (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Superimposed polygonal approximation analysis comparing 2D photography and 3D scanned images of bite marks on human skin 
260 0 |b Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH  |c 2021 
490 1 |a Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences 
650 0 4 |a 3D scanning 
650 0 4 |a Bite marks 
650 0 4 |a Forensic odontology 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-021-00233-7 
856 |z View in Scopus  |u https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85113243403&doi=10.1186%2fs41935-021-00233-7&partnerID=40&md5=543f642366edd4c5d71eb8c9235d7b90 
520 3 |a Background: Preservation of bite marks evidence has always been a major problem in forensic odontology due to progressive loss of details as time passes. The use of 2D photographs has been widely used to document forensic evidence and preserving bite marks; however, there are limitations to this method. This study aims to measure the accuracy of the 3D scanned image in comparison to 2D photograph registration of experimental bite marks. Thirty volunteers performed self-exertions of a bite mark on the respective forearm of subjects. A 2D photograph and 3D scanned image was immediately registered following bite mark exercise using a conventional camera and Afinia EinScan-Pro 2X PLUS Handheld 3D Scanner, respectively. The outlines of the bite mark were transformed into a polygonal shape. Next, the polygonal approximation analysis was performed by an arbitrary superimposition method. The difference between surface areas of both images was calculated (2D photographs ̶ 3D scanned images). Results: A paired t test was used to measure significance with α = 0.05. The mean surface area of 2D photographs and 3D scanned images is 31.535 cm2 and 31.822 cm2, respectively. No statistical difference was found between both mean surface areas (p > 0.05). The mean error (ME) is 0.287 ± 3.424 cm2 and the mean absolute error (MAE) is 1.733 ± 1.149 cm2. Conclusion: Bite marks registered with the 3D scanned image are comparable to the standard 2D photograph for bite mark evaluations. The use of a 3D scan may be adopted as a standard operating procedure in the forensic application, especially for evidence preservation. © 2021, The Author(s). 
700 1 0 |a Azahar, N.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Reduwan, N.H.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rizwal, A.A.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Yusof, M.Y.P.M.  |e author 
773 |t Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences