|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01528nam a2200229Ia 4500 |
001 |
10.1556-606.2021.00448 |
008 |
220425s2022 CNT 000 0 und d |
020 |
|
|
|a 17881994 (ISSN)
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Compressive, flexural and splitting strength of fly ash and silica fume concrete
|
260 |
|
0 |
|b Akademiai Kiado ZRt.
|c 2022
|
856 |
|
|
|z View Fulltext in Publisher
|u https://doi.org/10.1556/606.2021.00448
|
520 |
3 |
|
|a Cement replacement materials are commonly used in concrete technology. Several researchers have examined high-performance concrete after adding mineral admixtures to it, but further studies are still needed to provide the optimum dosage of these materials for instance fly ash and silica fume. This study compares three types of concrete and the mechanical properties (compressive strength, flexural strength, and splitting tensile) of these types at the age of 28 and 90 days. The test results designate that adding the mineral admixtures commonly affects the mechanical properties of all the tested types. However, silica fume is more operative than fly ash. Furthermore, adding the fly ash and silica fume in the same concrete type slightly improves the mechanical properties. © 2021 The Author(s).
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a compressive strength
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a flexural strength
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a fly ash
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a high-performance concrete
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a silica fume
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a splitting tensile
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Bozsaky, D.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Horvath, T.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Shmlls, M.
|e author
|
773 |
|
|
|t Pollack Periodica
|