Glass ionomer cements can be used for bonding orthodontic brackets after cancer radiation treatment?

Patients undergoing radiotherapy treatment present more susceptibility to dental caries and the use of an orthodontic device increases this risk factor due to biofilm accumulation around the brackets. The objective of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength to irradiated permanent teeth o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: de Oliveira, H.F (Author), de Queiroz, A.M (Author), Nelson Filho, P. (Author), Palma-Dibb, R.G (Author), Romano, F.L (Author), Santin, G.C (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associacao Brasileira de Divulgacao Cientifica 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 03516nam a2200565Ia 4500
001 10.1590-0103-6440201801436
008 220706s2018 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 01036440 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Glass ionomer cements can be used for bonding orthodontic brackets after cancer radiation treatment? 
260 0 |b Associacao Brasileira de Divulgacao Cientifica  |c 2018 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201801436 
520 3 |a Patients undergoing radiotherapy treatment present more susceptibility to dental caries and the use of an orthodontic device increases this risk factor due to biofilm accumulation around the brackets. The objective of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength to irradiated permanent teeth of orthodontic brackets bonded with conventional glass ionomer cement and resin-modified glass ionomer cement due to the fluoride release capacity of these materials. Ninety prepared human premolars were divided into 6 groups (n=15), according to the bonding material and use or not of radiation: CR: Transbond XT composite resin; RMGIC: Fuji Ortho LC conventional glass ionomer cement; GIC: Ketac Cem Easymix resin-modified glass ionomer cement. The groups were irradiated (I) or non-irradiated (NI) prior to bracket bonding. The specimens were subjected to a fractioned radiation dose of 2 Gy over 5 consecutive days for 6 weeks. After the radiotherapy, the brackets were bonded on the specimens with Transbond XT, Fuji Ortho LC and Ketac Cem Easymix. After 24 h, the specimens were subjected to shear bond strength test. The image of enamel surface (classified by Adhesive Remnant Index-ARI) was also evaluated and its frequency was checked among groups/subgroups. The shear bond strength variable was evaluated with ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test. GIC group showed the lowest adhesion values among the groups (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference among non-irradiated and irradiated groups (p>0.05). As for the ARI, the CR-I group showed the highest material retention on enamel surface among the irradiated groups. RMGIC group showed the highest values for shear bond strength and presented ARI acceptable for clinical practices. © 2018, Associacao Brasileira de Divulgacao Cientifica. All rights reserved. 
650 0 4 |a Acid Etching, Dental 
650 0 4 |a Bicuspid 
650 0 4 |a chemistry 
650 0 4 |a Composite Resins 
650 0 4 |a dental acid etching 
650 0 4 |a dental bonding 
650 0 4 |a Dental Bonding 
650 0 4 |a Dental enamel 
650 0 4 |a Dental Enamel 
650 0 4 |a enamel 
650 0 4 |a glass ionomer 
650 0 4 |a Glass ionomer 
650 0 4 |a Glass Ionomer Cements 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a in vitro study 
650 0 4 |a In Vitro Techniques 
650 0 4 |a ionizing radiation 
650 0 4 |a neoplasm 
650 0 4 |a Neoplasms 
650 0 4 |a orthodontic bracket 
650 0 4 |a Orthodontic Brackets 
650 0 4 |a Orthodontics brackets 
650 0 4 |a premolar tooth 
650 0 4 |a radiation response 
650 0 4 |a Radiation, Ionizing 
650 0 4 |a Radiotherapy 
650 0 4 |a resin 
650 0 4 |a Shear bond strength 
650 0 4 |a shear strength 
650 0 4 |a Shear Strength 
700 1 |a de Oliveira, H.F.  |e author 
700 1 |a de Queiroz, A.M.  |e author 
700 1 |a Nelson Filho, P.  |e author 
700 1 |a Palma-Dibb, R.G.  |e author 
700 1 |a Romano, F.L.  |e author 
700 1 |a Santin, G.C.  |e author 
773 |t Brazilian Dental Journal