|
|
|
|
LEADER |
03377nam a2200565Ia 4500 |
001 |
10.1590-0103-6440201801937 |
008 |
220706s2018 CNT 000 0 und d |
020 |
|
|
|a 01036440 (ISSN)
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Oval versus circular-shaped root canals: Bond strength reached with varying post techniques
|
260 |
|
0 |
|b Associacao Brasileira de Divulgacao Cientifica
|c 2018
|
856 |
|
|
|z View Fulltext in Publisher
|u https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201801937
|
520 |
3 |
|
|a The aim of this study was to compare the bond strength (BS) of glass fiber posts (GFP) luted to oval and circular-shaped root canals rehabilitated using varying post techniques, at different intraradicular levels. Ninety 16-mm-long roots of human mandibular premolars, classified either as having oval or circular-shaped canals, were endodontically treated and prepared for restoration using one of three different post techniques (n=15): 1) single GFP; 2) resin-relined GFP; 3) main GFP associated with accessory posts. GFPs were luted with a dual polymerizing resin cement (RelyX ARC) after the canal had been treated with a 3-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system (Adper Scothbond Multipurpose). The samples were sectioned into three 1-mm-thick sections, which were differentiated by the root level (cervical, middle and apical) and tested for push-out BS. Assessment of failure mode was made under a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using repeated measures three-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test. The root canal cross-section had a significant influence on BS (p<0.001), with the lowest values being observed in oval-shaped canals. The post technique also significantly affected the BS (p=0.018), with the resin-relined GFPs providing the highest BS values in both oval and circular-shaped canals. Irrespective of the cross-section of the root canal and post technique, there was no significant difference in BS in the cervical, middle and apical third of the root canal (p=0.084). In oval-shaped canals, the BS to intraradicular dentin at cervical, middle or apical level could be increased when the GFPs posts were relined. © 2018, Associacao Brasileira de Divulgacao Cientifica. All rights reserved.
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a anatomy and histology
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Bicuspid
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Bond strength
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Canal cross-section shape
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a chemistry
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a dental bonding
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Dental Bonding
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Dental Cements
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a dental procedure
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a dental pulp cavity
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Dental Pulp Cavity
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Dental Stress Analysis
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a endodontic procedure
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a glass
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Glass
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a glass fiber
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Glass fiber post
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a human
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Humans
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a in vitro study
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a In Vitro Techniques
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Intraradicular dentin
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Post and Core Technique
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Post technique
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a premolar tooth
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a procedures
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a resin cement
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Resin Cements
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Root Canal Therapy
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a tooth cement
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a tooth crown
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Amaral, F.L.B.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Basting, R.T.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Bernardon, P.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a França, F.M.G.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Turssi, C.P.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Webber, M.B.F.
|e author
|
773 |
|
|
|t Brazilian Dental Journal
|