Treatment utilization patterns of newly initiated oral anticancer agents in a national sample of Medicare beneficiaries

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined oral anticancer treatment utilization patterns among Medicare beneficiaries. OBJECTIVE: To assess treatment utilization patterns of newly initiated oral anticancer agents across national samples of Medicare beneficiaries for 5 cancer types: chronic myeloid leuke...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brown, V.T (Author), Doshi, J.A (Author), Jahnke, J. (Author), Li, P. (Author), Manz, C.R (Author), Puckett, J.T (Author), Raman, S. (Author), Ward, M.A (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 05527nam a2200937Ia 4500
001 10.18553-JMCP.2021.27.10.1457
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 23760540 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Treatment utilization patterns of newly initiated oral anticancer agents in a national sample of Medicare beneficiaries 
260 0 |b Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP)  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.18553/JMCP.2021.27.10.1457 
520 3 |a BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined oral anticancer treatment utilization patterns among Medicare beneficiaries. OBJECTIVE: To assess treatment utilization patterns of newly initiated oral anticancer agents across national samples of Medicare beneficiaries for 5 cancer types: chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), multiple myeloma (MM), metastatic prostate cancer (mPC), metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), and metastatic breast cancer (mBC). METHODS: This retrospective claims analysis used 100% Medicare Chronic Condition Data Warehouse (CCW) Parts A, B, and D files from 2011 to 2014 (for CML, MM, mPC, and mRCC patients) and a 5% random fee-for-service sample from 2011 to 2013 (for mBC patients). Outcomes of interest were the number of 30-day supply prescriptions, adherence, and discontinuation of newly initiated (ie, index) oral anticancer agents indicated for each of the cancers. Adherence was calculated with both the “traditional” proportion of days covered (PDC) approach, measured over a fixed 1-year period or until hospice/death, and a “modified” PDC approach, measured over the time between the first and last fill of the index oral anticancer agent. Patients with PDC of at least 0.80 were deemed as being adherent. Discontinuation was defined as the presence of a continuous 90-day gap in the availability of days supply of the index oral anticancer agent. RESULTS: Our study included 1,650, 7,461, 6,998, 2,553, and 79 patients for CML, MM, mPC, mRCC, and mBC, respectively. Patients with mRCC had the highest proportion of patients with only 1 fill of their index anticancer agent (28%) followed by mBC (17%), MM (17%), mPC (12%), and CML (12%). Patients with CML had the highest mean (SD) number of 30-day supply equivalent prescriptions (8.3 [4.6]), followed by patients with mPC (6.5 [4.2]), MM (5.7 [4.1]), mBC (4.7 [3.2]), and mRCC (4.5 [3.9]). Using the modified PDC measured between the first and last fills, approximately three-quarters of patients with CML (74%), mRCC (71%), and mBC (70%) were adherent to the index oral anticancer agent. Adherence was highest for patients with mPC (87%) and lowest for patients with MM (58%). The percentage of patients defined as adherent to the index oral anticancer agent decreased for all cancers when using the traditional PDC measure over a fixed 1-year period: CML (54%), MM (35%), mPC (48%), mRCC (37%), and mBC (22%). Rates of discontinuation for patients in our sample were 32% (CML), 38% (mPC), 42% (mRCC), 48% (MM), and 58% (mBC). CONCLUSIONS: Between 13% and 42% of Medicare patients were nonadherent between the first and last fill of their newly initiated oral anticancer therapies across a range of cancers. This study provides a valuable benchmark for stakeholders seeking to measure and improve adherence to oral anticancer agents in Medicare patients. © 2021 Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP). All rights reserved. 
650 0 4 |a abiraterone 
650 0 4 |a Administration, Oral 
650 0 4 |a aged 
650 0 4 |a Aged 
650 0 4 |a Aged, 80 and over 
650 0 4 |a antineoplastic agent 
650 0 4 |a antineoplastic agent 
650 0 4 |a Antineoplastic Agents 
650 0 4 |a Article 
650 0 4 |a axitinib 
650 0 4 |a bosutinib 
650 0 4 |a Carcinoma, Renal Cell 
650 0 4 |a chronic myeloid leukemia 
650 0 4 |a clinical practice 
650 0 4 |a dasatinib 
650 0 4 |a Databases, Factual 
650 0 4 |a drug utilization 
650 0 4 |a economics 
650 0 4 |a enzalutamide 
650 0 4 |a everolimus 
650 0 4 |a factual database 
650 0 4 |a female 
650 0 4 |a Female 
650 0 4 |a follow up 
650 0 4 |a hospice 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a imatinib 
650 0 4 |a kidney metastasis 
650 0 4 |a lapatinib 
650 0 4 |a lenalidomide 
650 0 4 |a major clinical study 
650 0 4 |a male 
650 0 4 |a Male 
650 0 4 |a medicare 
650 0 4 |a Medicare 
650 0 4 |a Medication Adherence 
650 0 4 |a medication compliance 
650 0 4 |a metastatic breast cancer 
650 0 4 |a middle aged 
650 0 4 |a Middle Aged 
650 0 4 |a multiple myeloma 
650 0 4 |a nilotinib 
650 0 4 |a oral drug administration 
650 0 4 |a patient compliance 
650 0 4 |a pazopanib 
650 0 4 |a pomalidomide 
650 0 4 |a ponatinib 
650 0 4 |a Practice Patterns, Physicians' 
650 0 4 |a prescription 
650 0 4 |a prostate cancer 
650 0 4 |a renal cell carcinoma 
650 0 4 |a Retrospective Studies 
650 0 4 |a retrospective study 
650 0 4 |a sorafenib 
650 0 4 |a sunitinib 
650 0 4 |a thalidomide 
650 0 4 |a United States 
650 0 4 |a United States 
650 0 4 |a very elderly 
700 1 |a Brown, V.T.  |e author 
700 1 |a Doshi, J.A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Jahnke, J.  |e author 
700 1 |a Li, P.  |e author 
700 1 |a Manz, C.R.  |e author 
700 1 |a Puckett, J.T.  |e author 
700 1 |a Raman, S.  |e author 
700 1 |a Ward, M.A.  |e author 
773 |t Journal of Managed Care and Specialty Pharmacy