Prevalence of drug-drug interactions with pangenotypic direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C and real-world care management in the United States: A retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND: Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens for hepatitis C virus (HCV) have varying potentials for drug-drug interactions (DDIs). OBJECTIVES: To (1) identify prevalence of potential DDI with glecaprevir-pibrentasvir (GLE-PIB) and sofosbuvir-velpatasvir (SOF-VEL) and (2) describe health care...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Afdhal, N.H (Author), Curry, M.P (Author), Flamm, S.L (Author), Milligan, S. (Author), Tsai, N. (Author), Wick, N. (Author), Younossi, Z. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 06804nam a2201525Ia 4500
001 10.18553-jmcp.2021.20550
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 23760540 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Prevalence of drug-drug interactions with pangenotypic direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C and real-world care management in the United States: A retrospective observational study 
260 0 |b Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP)  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2021.20550 
520 3 |a BACKGROUND: Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens for hepatitis C virus (HCV) have varying potentials for drug-drug interactions (DDIs). OBJECTIVES: To (1) identify prevalence of potential DDI with glecaprevir-pibrentasvir (GLE-PIB) and sofosbuvir-velpatasvir (SOF-VEL) and (2) describe health care provider actions in response to pharmacist recommendations based on potential interactions with GLE-PIB or SOF-VEL, using 2 complementary data sources. METHODS: Possible interacting drugs were identified among adult patients in a United States electronic medical record database covering 21 health care organizations and 26 million patients in 2018. DDIs were categorized as potential weak interaction (Level 1), potential interaction (Level 2), or contraindicated (Level 3). Real-world recommendations and resultant actions regarding DDIs with GLE-PIB and SOF-VEL were obtained from a specialty pharmacy database. Categorical variable comparisons were done via chi-square analysis with subsequent z-tests of column proportions. RESULTS: DDI prevalence was higher for patients prescribed GLE-PIB (317/769 [41%]) compared with those prescribed SOF-VEL (170/633 [27%]), and the prevalence of a Level 3 (contraindicated) interaction was higher with GLE-PIB than SOF-VEL (61/769 [8%] vs 2/633 [< 1%]). Across all DDI levels, analgesics (139/317 [44%]), proton-pump inhibitors (129/317 [41%]), and lipid-lowering agents (59/317 [19%]) were the top drug classes for the GLE-PIB group with potential for DDI. For SOF-VEL prescribed patients, the top drug classes were proton-pump inhibitors (83/170 [49%]), histamine-2 blockers (42/170[ 25%]), and lipid-lowering agents (42/170 [25%]). In real-world care management, the overall prevalence of pharmacist recommendations regarding DDIs was significantly lower for SOF-VEL (28/419 [7%]) relative to GLEPIB (151/1,216 [12%]). Recommended guidance from pharmacists was not followed for 39% (69/179) of patients, 36% (54/151) for GLE-PIB, and 54% (15/28) for SOF-VEL. CONCLUSIONS: The potential for DDIs with pangenotypic HCV DAAs is frequent and may be more frequent with GLE-PIB than SOF-VEL. Physician responses to pharmacist alerts regarding potential interaction can be highly variable, even in cases of contraindication. © 2021, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. 
650 0 4 |a adolescent 
650 0 4 |a Adolescent 
650 0 4 |a adult 
650 0 4 |a Adult 
650 0 4 |a aged 
650 0 4 |a Aged 
650 0 4 |a analgesic agent 
650 0 4 |a anti human immunodeficiency virus agent 
650 0 4 |a antiarrhythmic agent 
650 0 4 |a anticoagulant agent 
650 0 4 |a anticonvulsant therapy 
650 0 4 |a anticonvulsive agent 
650 0 4 |a antidiabetic agent 
650 0 4 |a antihistaminic agent 
650 0 4 |a antihypertensive agent 
650 0 4 |a antihypertensive therapy 
650 0 4 |a antiinfective agent 
650 0 4 |a antilipemic agent 
650 0 4 |a antineoplastic agent 
650 0 4 |a Antiviral Agents 
650 0 4 |a antivirus agent 
650 0 4 |a antivirus agent 
650 0 4 |a anxiety 
650 0 4 |a Article 
650 0 4 |a atorvastatin 
650 0 4 |a beta adrenergic receptor blocking agent 
650 0 4 |a bronchodilating agent 
650 0 4 |a buprenorphine 
650 0 4 |a calcium channel blocking agent 
650 0 4 |a cancer therapy 
650 0 4 |a carbamazepine 
650 0 4 |a Charlson Comorbidity Index 
650 0 4 |a chi square test 
650 0 4 |a contraceptive agent 
650 0 4 |a data base 
650 0 4 |a diabetes mellitus 
650 0 4 |a drug classification 
650 0 4 |a drug contraindication 
650 0 4 |a drug effect 
650 0 4 |a drug interaction 
650 0 4 |a Drug Interactions 
650 0 4 |a drug safety 
650 0 4 |a dyslipidemia 
650 0 4 |a electronic medical record 
650 0 4 |a eltrombopag 
650 0 4 |a esomeprazole 
650 0 4 |a ethinylestradiol 
650 0 4 |a etonogestrel 
650 0 4 |a famotidine 
650 0 4 |a female 
650 0 4 |a Female 
650 0 4 |a fentanyl 
650 0 4 |a genotype 
650 0 4 |a Genotype 
650 0 4 |a glecaprevir plus pibrentasvir 
650 0 4 |a health care organization 
650 0 4 |a health care personnel 
650 0 4 |a Hepacivirus 
650 0 4 |a Hepacivirus 
650 0 4 |a hepatitis C 
650 0 4 |a hepatitis C 
650 0 4 |a Hepatitis C 
650 0 4 |a Hepatitis C virus genotype 1 
650 0 4 |a Hepatitis C virus genotype 2 
650 0 4 |a Hepatitis C virus genotype 3 
650 0 4 |a Hepatitis C virus genotype 4 
650 0 4 |a Hepatitis C virus genotype 5 
650 0 4 |a Hepatitis C virus genotype 6 
650 0 4 |a histamine H2 receptor antagonist 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Human immunodeficiency virus infection 
650 0 4 |a Human immunodeficiency virus proteinase inhibitor 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a hydrocodone 
650 0 4 |a hypertension 
650 0 4 |a immunosuppressive agent 
650 0 4 |a levonorgestrel 
650 0 4 |a major clinical study 
650 0 4 |a male 
650 0 4 |a Male 
650 0 4 |a middle aged 
650 0 4 |a Middle Aged 
650 0 4 |a neuroleptic agent 
650 0 4 |a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor 
650 0 4 |a observational study 
650 0 4 |a omeprazole 
650 0 4 |a oxcarbazepine 
650 0 4 |a oxycodone 
650 0 4 |a pantoprazole 
650 0 4 |a pharmacist 
650 0 4 |a phenobarbital 
650 0 4 |a phenytoin 
650 0 4 |a prevalence 
650 0 4 |a prevalence 
650 0 4 |a Prevalence 
650 0 4 |a proton pump inhibitor 
650 0 4 |a ranitidine 
650 0 4 |a Retrospective Studies 
650 0 4 |a retrospective study 
650 0 4 |a rifampicin 
650 0 4 |a RNA directed DNA polymerase inhibitor 
650 0 4 |a simvastatin 
650 0 4 |a sofosbuvir plus velpatasvir 
650 0 4 |a specialty pharmacy 
650 0 4 |a steroid 
650 0 4 |a United States 
650 0 4 |a United States 
650 0 4 |a urinary tract agent 
650 0 4 |a young adult 
650 0 4 |a Young Adult 
700 1 |a Afdhal, N.H.  |e author 
700 1 |a Curry, M.P.  |e author 
700 1 |a Flamm, S.L.  |e author 
700 1 |a Milligan, S.  |e author 
700 1 |a Tsai, N.  |e author 
700 1 |a Wick, N.  |e author 
700 1 |a Younossi, Z.  |e author 
773 |t Journal of Managed Care and Specialty Pharmacy