A comparative assessment of the amount and rate of orthodontic space closure toward a healed vs recent lower premolar extraction site

• Main Authors: Abu Alhaija, E.S (Author), Al Shayeb, R.A (Author), Al-Khateeb, S. (Author), Daher, H.O (Author), Daher, S.O (Author)
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: NLM (Medline) 2022
• Subjects: Bicuspid; Healed; human; Humans; Lower arch; Molar; molar tooth; orthodontic space closure; Orthodontic Space Closure; premolar tooth; Recent; Space closure, Tipping; stainless steel; Stainless Steel; surgery; tooth extraction; Tooth Extraction
• Online Access: View Fulltext in Publisher

 OBJECTIVES: To investigate and compare the amount and rate of space closure and tooth tipping during orthodontic space closure toward a recent vs healed first premolar extraction site. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The mandibular arches of 23 patients were included. Treatment plans included lower first premolar extractions. After reaching 0.019 × 0.025-inch stainless-steel archwires (SSAW), patients were subdivided into two groups (Group 1: space closure was carried out toward a healed first premolar extraction space and Group 2: space closure was carried out immediately after first premolar extraction). Elastomeric power chain from second molar to second molar was used to close lower extraction spaces. The following time points were defined: T1: just before space closure; T2-T4: 1-3 months after initial space closure. Records consisted of dental study models. The amount and rate of extraction space closure were evaluated at each time point. RESULTS: In Group 1 (healed socket), a total amount of 1.98 mm (coronally) and 1.75 mm (gingivally) of space closure was achieved. The rate of space closure was 0.66 mm/month coronally and 0.58 mm/month gingivally. In Group 2 (recent socket), the total amount of space closure was 3.02 mm coronally and 2.68 mm gingivally. The rate of space closure was 1.01 mm/month coronally and 0.89 mm/month gingivally. Differences between the two groups were significant (P < .01). Tipping of adjacent teeth during space closure was similar in both groups (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: In the lower arch, the amount and rate of space closure toward a recent extraction site were higher than that toward a healed extraction socket with similar tipping of teeth in both groups. © 2022 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc.