|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02622nam a2200457Ia 4500 |
| 001 |
10.3389-fmats.2022.859687 |
| 008 |
220510s2022 CNT 000 0 und d |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 22968016 (ISSN)
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Analytical Model of Crack Width in Hogging Moment Regions of Steel–Concrete Composite Beams Under Fatigue Loading
|
| 260 |
|
0 |
|b Frontiers Media S.A.
|c 2022
|
| 856 |
|
|
|z View Fulltext in Publisher
|u https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2022.859687
|
| 520 |
3 |
|
|a A modified formula for average crack spacing and a numerical model for crack width in hogging moment regions of steel–concrete composite beams under fatigue loading are proposed in this article. First, the existing calculation formulas and test data of average crack spacing are discussed and summarized. By introducing the factor of transverse reinforcement spacing, a modified formula of crack spacing is suggested based on the method of non-linear fitting. Then, a numerical model for crack width in negative moment regions under fatigue loading is proposed. In the analytical model, the explicit formulations of slip occurring at both the beam–slab interface and the reinforcement–concrete interface are included by considering fatigue effects, as well as the stress of reinforcement in the cracked section. Finally, a fatigue test on two steel–concrete composite plate beams subjected to hogging moment is designed and conducted. Compared with the crack width evaluation methods in the existing literature, the analysis results of the numerical model show more reasonable agreement with the data of the experimental beams performed in this study. Copyright © 2022 Song, Xu, Wan and Luo.
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Analytical models
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Calculation formula
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Composite beams and girders
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Concrete beams and girders
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Crack spacing
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a crack width
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Cracks
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Crack-width
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a fatigue
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Fatigue loadings
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Fatigue of materials
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Fatigue testing
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a hogging moment region
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Hogging moment region
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Hogging moments
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Numerical methods
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a numerical model
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Numerical models
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Reinforcement
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Reinforcement spacing
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Steel concrete composite beam
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a steel–concrete composite beam
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Test data
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Transverse reinforcement
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Luo, Q.
|e author
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Song, A.
|e author
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Wan, S.
|e author
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Xu, H.
|e author
|
| 773 |
|
|
|t Frontiers in Materials
|
