Safety and Tolerability of a Wearable, Vibrotactile Stimulation Device for Parkinson’s Disease

Background: Resting tremor is a cardinal symptom of Parkinson’s disease (PD) that contributes to the physical, emotional, and economic burden of the disease. Objective: The goal of this study was to investigate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary effectiveness of a novel wearable vibrotactile...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Braren, S. (Author), Fry, A. (Author), Patterson, T. (Author), Putrino, D. (Author), Tabacof, L. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 03087nam a2200565Ia 4500
001 10.3389-fnhum.2021.712621
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 16625161 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Safety and Tolerability of a Wearable, Vibrotactile Stimulation Device for Parkinson’s Disease 
260 0 |b Frontiers Media S.A.  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.712621 
520 3 |a Background: Resting tremor is a cardinal symptom of Parkinson’s disease (PD) that contributes to the physical, emotional, and economic burden of the disease. Objective: The goal of this study was to investigate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary effectiveness of a novel wearable vibrotactile stimulation device on resting tremor in individuals with PD. Methods: Using a randomized cross-over design, subjects received two different vibrotactile stimulation paradigms (high amplitude patterned and low amplitude continuous) on two separate laboratory visits. On each visit, resting tremor was video recorded for 10 min at baseline and while the vibrotactile stimulation was applied. Tremor severity was scored by a blinded clinician. Results: Both vibration paradigms were well safe and well tolerated and resulted in a reduction in resting tremor severity with a moderate effect size (n = 44, p < 0.001, r = 0.37–0.54). There was no significant difference between the two vibration paradigms (p = 0.14). Conclusion: Short durations of vibrotactile stimulation delivered via wearable devices were safe and well tolerated and may attenuate resting tremor severity in individuals with PD. The sample size as well as the potential preliminary effectiveness revealed by two arms of the study could not eliminate the potential for a placebo effect. Copyright © 2021 Tabacof, Braren, Patterson, Fry and Putrino. 
650 0 4 |a aged 
650 0 4 |a antidepressant agent 
650 0 4 |a Article 
650 0 4 |a clinical article 
650 0 4 |a clinical effectiveness 
650 0 4 |a controlled study 
650 0 4 |a crossover procedure 
650 0 4 |a depression 
650 0 4 |a disease severity 
650 0 4 |a dopamine receptor stimulating agent 
650 0 4 |a effect size 
650 0 4 |a feedback system 
650 0 4 |a female 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a levodopa 
650 0 4 |a male 
650 0 4 |a mechanical stimulation 
650 0 4 |a Parkinson disease 
650 0 4 |a Parkinson tremor 
650 0 4 |a Parkinson’s disease 
650 0 4 |a randomized controlled trial 
650 0 4 |a resting tremor 
650 0 4 |a resting tremor 
650 0 4 |a tremor 
650 0 4 |a Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale 
650 0 4 |a UPDRS 
650 0 4 |a vibration 
650 0 4 |a vibration therapy 
650 0 4 |a vibrotactile 
650 0 4 |a vibrotactile masking 
650 0 4 |a wearable technologies 
650 0 4 |a wearables acceptance 
700 1 |a Braren, S.  |e author 
700 1 |a Fry, A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Patterson, T.  |e author 
700 1 |a Putrino, D.  |e author 
700 1 |a Tabacof, L.  |e author 
773 |t Frontiers in Human Neuroscience