Remembering a Virtual Museum Tour: Viewing Time, Memory Reactivation, and Memory Distortion

A variety of evidence demonstrates that memory is a reconstructive process prone to errors and distortions. However, the complex relationship between memory encoding, strength of memory reactivation, and the likelihood of reporting true or false memories has yet to be ascertained. We address this is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daviddi, S. (Author), Mastroberardino, S. (Author), Santangelo, V. (Author), Schacter, D.L (Author), St. Jacques, P.L (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02672nam a2200253Ia 4500
001 10.3389-fpsyg.2022.869336
008 220517s2022 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 16641078 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Remembering a Virtual Museum Tour: Viewing Time, Memory Reactivation, and Memory Distortion 
260 0 |b Frontiers Media S.A.  |c 2022 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.869336 
520 3 |a A variety of evidence demonstrates that memory is a reconstructive process prone to errors and distortions. However, the complex relationship between memory encoding, strength of memory reactivation, and the likelihood of reporting true or false memories has yet to be ascertained. We address this issue in a setting that mimics a real-life experience: We asked participants to take a virtual museum tour in which they freely explored artworks included in the exhibit, while we measured the participants’ spontaneous viewing time of each explored artwork. In a following memory reactivation phase, participants were presented again with explored artworks (reactivated targets), followed by novel artworks not belonging to the same exhibit (activated lures). For each of these objects, participants provided a reliving rating that indexed the strength of memory reactivation. In the final memory recognition phase, participants underwent an old/new memory task, involving reactivated vs. baseline (i.e., non-reactivated) targets, and activated and baseline lures. The results showed that those targets that were spontaneously viewed for a longer amount of time were more frequently correctly recognized. This pattern was particularly true for reactivated targets associated with greater memory strength (a higher reliving rating). Paradoxically, however, lures that were presented after targets associated with higher reliving ratings in the reactivation phase were more often erroneously recognized as artworks encountered during the tour. This latter finding indicates that memory intrusions, irrespective of the viewing time, are more likely to take place and be incorporated into true memories when the strength of target memory is higher. Copyright © 2022 Daviddi, Mastroberardino, St. Jacques, Schacter and Santangelo. 
650 0 4 |a autobiographical memory 
650 0 4 |a false memories 
650 0 4 |a memory encoding 
650 0 4 |a memory reactivation 
650 0 4 |a memory recognition 
650 0 4 |a virtual tour 
700 1 |a Daviddi, S.  |e author 
700 1 |a Mastroberardino, S.  |e author 
700 1 |a Santangelo, V.  |e author 
700 1 |a Schacter, D.L.  |e author 
700 1 |a St. Jacques, P.L.  |e author 
773 |t Frontiers in Psychology