|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01992nam a2200229Ia 4500 |
001 |
10.3389-fspor.2021.735046 |
008 |
220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d |
020 |
|
|
|a 26249367 (ISSN)
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Validity and Reliability of the Computrainer Lab™ During Simulated 40 and 100 km Time-Trials
|
260 |
|
0 |
|b Frontiers Media S.A.
|c 2021
|
856 |
|
|
|z View Fulltext in Publisher
|u https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2021.735046
|
520 |
3 |
|
|a The validity and reliability of the Computrainer Lab™ (CT) was assessed, for the first time, using a high-precision motor-driven calibration rig during simulated variable intensity 40 and 100 km time-trials (TTs). The load patterns imposed by the CT were designed from previously published studies in trained cyclists and included multiple 1 or 4 km bursts in power output. For the 40 and 100 km TTs, cluster-based analyses revealed a mean measurement error from the true workload of respectively 0.7 and 0.9%. However, measurement errors were dependent upon the workload variations, fluctuating from 0.2 to 5.1%. Average biases between repeated trials were contained within ± 1.1% for both TTs. In conclusion, using 40 and 100 km TTs containing 1 or 4 km bursts in power output, the present results indicate that (1) the CT can reliably be used by scientists to determine differences between research interventions; (2) the CT provides valid results of power output when data are being analyzed as a whole to derive one mean value of power output and; (3) variations in workload make it difficult to determine at any one time the veracity of the true power output produced by the athlete. Copyright © 2021 Jeker, Gosselin, Drouet and Goulet.
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a assessment
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a cycling
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a cycling ergometer
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a performance
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a validity
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Drouet, J.-M.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Gosselin, J.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Goulet, E.D.B.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Jeker, D.
|e author
|
773 |
|
|
|t Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
|