Multi-Objective Optimization of the Basic and Regenerative ORC Integrated with Working Fluid Selection

A multi-objective optimization based on the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) is carried out in the present work for the basic organic Rankine cycle (BORC) and regenerative ORC (RORC) systems. The selection of working fluids is integrated into multi-objective optimization by paramete...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hong, G. (Author), Miao, Z. (Author), Ruan, J. (Author), Zhou, Y. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02350nam a2200253Ia 4500
001 10.3390-e24070902
008 220718s2022 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 10994300 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Multi-Objective Optimization of the Basic and Regenerative ORC Integrated with Working Fluid Selection 
260 0 |b MDPI  |c 2022 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.3390/e24070902 
520 3 |a A multi-objective optimization based on the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) is carried out in the present work for the basic organic Rankine cycle (BORC) and regenerative ORC (RORC) systems. The selection of working fluids is integrated into multi-objective optimization by parameterizing the pure working fluids into a two-dimensional array. Two sets of decision indicators, exergy efficiency vs. thermal efficiency and exergy efficiency vs. levelized energy cost (LEC), are adopted and examined. Five decision variables including the turbine inlet tem-perature, vapor superheat degree, the evaporator and condenser pinch temperature differences, and the mass fraction of the mixture are optimized. It is found that the turbine inlet temperature is the most effective factor for both the BORC and RORC systems. Compared to the reverse variation of exergy efficiency and thermal efficiency, only a weak conflict exists between the exergy efficiency and LEC which tends to make the binary objective optimization be a single objective optimization. The RORC provides higher thermal efficiency than BORC at the same exergy efficiency while the LEC of RORC also becomes higher because the bare module cost of buying one more heat exchange is higher than the cost reduction due to the reduced heat transfer area. Under the heat source temperature of 423.15 K, the final obtained exergy and thermal efficiencies are 45.6% and 16.6% for BORC, and 38.6% and 20.7% for RORC, respectively. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. 
650 0 4 |a exergy efficiency 
650 0 4 |a levelized energy cost 
650 0 4 |a multi-objective optimization 
650 0 4 |a NSGA-II 
650 0 4 |a regenerative ORC system 
650 0 4 |a thermal efficiency 
650 0 4 |a working fluid selection 
700 1 |a Hong, G.  |e author 
700 1 |a Miao, Z.  |e author 
700 1 |a Ruan, J.  |e author 
700 1 |a Zhou, Y.  |e author 
773 |t Entropy