Whole Body Vibration Exposure Transmitted to Drivers of Heavy Equipment Vehicles: A Comparative Case According to the Short-and Long-Term Exposure Assessment Methodologies Defined in ISO 2631-1 and ISO 2631-5

The construction and transport sectors are the industries with the highest proportions of workers exposed to vibrations in the European Union. Heavy equipment vehicle (HEV) drivers often perform operations on different uneven surfaces and are exposed to whole body vibration (WBV) on a daily basis. R...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aguilar, A.J (Author), de la Hoz-Torres, M.L (Author), Martínez-Aires, M.D (Author), Ruiz, D.P (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02663nam a2200373Ia 4500
001 10.3390-ijerph19095206
008 220510s2022 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 16617827 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Whole Body Vibration Exposure Transmitted to Drivers of Heavy Equipment Vehicles: A Comparative Case According to the Short-and Long-Term Exposure Assessment Methodologies Defined in ISO 2631-1 and ISO 2631-5 
260 0 |b MDPI  |c 2022 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095206 
520 3 |a The construction and transport sectors are the industries with the highest proportions of workers exposed to vibrations in the European Union. Heavy equipment vehicle (HEV) drivers often perform operations on different uneven surfaces and are exposed to whole body vibration (WBV) on a daily basis. Recently, a new version of ISO 2631-5 was published. However, since this new method required as input the individual exposure profile and the acceleration signals recorded on more surfaces, limited studies have been carried out to evaluate HEV operations according to this standard. The objectives of this study were to assess the WBV exposure using the methods defined in ISO 2631-1:1997 and ISO 2631-5:2018 and to compare the obtained health risk assessments between drivers with different anthropometric characteristics. For this purpose, two drivers were selected and a field measurement campaign was conducted. Regarding short-term assessment, results showed that VDV was the most restrictive method with exposure levels above the exposure action limit value, while SAd indicated that the same exposures were safe for the worker. With respect to long-term assessment, Risk Factor RA showed that the driver with the highest body mass index was the only one who exceeded the low probability limit of adverse health effects. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. 
650 0 4 |a acceleration 
650 0 4 |a article 
650 0 4 |a body mass 
650 0 4 |a clinical assessment 
650 0 4 |a controlled study 
650 0 4 |a health risk assessment 
650 0 4 |a Heavy equipment vehicles 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a ISO2631-1:1997 
650 0 4 |a ISO2631-5:2018 
650 0 4 |a long term exposure 
650 0 4 |a probability 
650 0 4 |a risk assessment 
650 0 4 |a risk factor 
650 0 4 |a whole body vibration 
650 0 4 |a whole-body vibration 
650 0 4 |a worker 
700 1 |a Aguilar, A.J.  |e author 
700 1 |a de la Hoz-Torres, M.L.  |e author 
700 1 |a Martínez-Aires, M.D.  |e author 
700 1 |a Ruiz, D.P.  |e author 
773 |t International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health