Implementation of Sacrificial Support Structures for Hybrid Manufacturing of Thin Walls

Thin-walled features can be difficult to produce with traditional machining methods which often rely on excess stock material for stiffness. This challenge is increased in hybrid manufacturing where the feature is already near net shape before machining. Significant workpiece deflection can result i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kurfess, T. (Author), Nycz, A. (Author), Saldana, C. (Author), Vaughan, D. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02333nam a2200229Ia 4500
001 10.3390-jmmp6040070
008 220718s2022 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 25044494 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Implementation of Sacrificial Support Structures for Hybrid Manufacturing of Thin Walls 
260 0 |b MDPI  |c 2022 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp6040070 
520 3 |a Thin-walled features can be difficult to produce with traditional machining methods which often rely on excess stock material for stiffness. This challenge is increased in hybrid manufacturing where the feature is already near net shape before machining. Significant workpiece deflection can result in poor geometric and surface finish tolerances on the finished part. A potential solution to this problem is to implement sacrificial support structures to the as-printed geometry. The supports are then machined away during the finishing portion of the hybrid process. In the present work, several different design parameters for these sacrificial supports were evaluated to determine their impact on the quality of representative thin wall geometry samples. The angle, height, and spacing of triangular support structures were varied for each sample and then machined and examined. The addition of these supports relative to an unsupported configuration provided a deflection reduction of around 0.2 mm. Surface roughness was improved by approximately 1.5 µm. Increasing values of support height were found to correspond to reduced wall deflection. Similarly, decreasing values of support angle and support spacing improved geometric accuracy. Efficiency comparisons showed that increases in print time corresponded to rapidly diminishing gains in geometric accuracy but continued to improve surface roughness. Implications for hybrid finishing of additively manufactured thin-walled structures is briefly discussed. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. 
650 0 4 |a additive manufacturing 
650 0 4 |a DED process 
650 0 4 |a hybrid manufacturing 
650 0 4 |a machining deformation 
650 0 4 |a thin wall machining 
700 1 |a Kurfess, T.  |e author 
700 1 |a Nycz, A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Saldana, C.  |e author 
700 1 |a Vaughan, D.  |e author 
773 |t Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing