Evaluation of Feature Selection Methods for Classification of Epileptic Seizure EEG Signals

Epilepsy is a disease that decreases the quality of life of patients; it is also among the most common neurological diseases. Several studies have approached the classification and prediction of seizures by using electroencephalographic data and machine learning techniques. A large diversity of feat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Román-Godínez, I. (Author), Salido-Ruiz, R.A (Author), Sánchez-Hernández, S.E (Author), Torres-Ramos, S. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: NLM (Medline) 2022
Subjects:
EEG
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02670nam a2200433Ia 4500
001 10.3390-s22083066
008 220510s2022 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 14248220 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Evaluation of Feature Selection Methods for Classification of Epileptic Seizure EEG Signals 
260 0 |b NLM (Medline)  |c 2022 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.3390/s22083066 
520 3 |a Epilepsy is a disease that decreases the quality of life of patients; it is also among the most common neurological diseases. Several studies have approached the classification and prediction of seizures by using electroencephalographic data and machine learning techniques. A large diversity of features has been extracted from electroencephalograms to perform classification tasks; therefore, it is important to use feature selection methods to select those that leverage pattern recognition. In this study, the performance of a set of feature selection methods was compared across different classification models; the classification task consisted of the detection of ictal activity from the CHB-MIT and Siena Scalp EEG databases. The comparison was implemented for different feature sets and the number of features. Furthermore, the similarity between selected feature subsets across classification models was evaluated. The best F1-score (0.90) was reported by the K-nearest neighbor along with the CHB-MIT dataset. Results showed that none of the feature selection methods clearly outperformed the rest of the methods, as the performance was notably affected by the classifier, dataset, and feature set. Two of the combinations (classifier/feature selection method) reporting the best results were K-nearest neighbor/support vector machine and random forest/embedded random forest. 
650 0 4 |a algorithm 
650 0 4 |a Algorithms 
650 0 4 |a EEG 
650 0 4 |a electroencephalography 
650 0 4 |a Electroencephalography 
650 0 4 |a epilepsy 
650 0 4 |a Epilepsy 
650 0 4 |a feature selection 
650 0 4 |a features 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a machine learning 
650 0 4 |a procedures 
650 0 4 |a quality of life 
650 0 4 |a Quality of Life 
650 0 4 |a seizure 
650 0 4 |a seizure detection 
650 0 4 |a Seizures 
650 0 4 |a signal processing 
650 0 4 |a Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted 
650 0 4 |a support vector machine 
650 0 4 |a Support Vector Machine 
700 1 |a Román-Godínez, I.  |e author 
700 1 |a Salido-Ruiz, R.A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Sánchez-Hernández, S.E.  |e author 
700 1 |a Torres-Ramos, S.  |e author 
773 |t Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)