Correction Model for Metal Oxide Sensor Drift Caused by Ambient Temperature and Humidity

For decades, Metal oxide (MOX) gas sensors have been commercially available and used in various applications such as the Smart City, gas monitoring, and safety due to advantages such as high sensitivity, a high detection range, fast reaction time, and cost-effectiveness. However, several factors aff...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdullah, A.N (Author), Adom, A.H (Author), Bennetts, V.H (Author), Juffry, Z.H.M (Author), Kamarudin, K. (Author), Kamarudin, L.M (Author), Mamduh, S.M (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 03263nam a2200493Ia 4500
001 10.3390-s22093301
008 220510s2022 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 14248220 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Correction Model for Metal Oxide Sensor Drift Caused by Ambient Temperature and Humidity 
260 0 |b MDPI  |c 2022 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.3390/s22093301 
520 3 |a For decades, Metal oxide (MOX) gas sensors have been commercially available and used in various applications such as the Smart City, gas monitoring, and safety due to advantages such as high sensitivity, a high detection range, fast reaction time, and cost-effectiveness. However, several factors affect the sensing ability of MOX gas sensors. This article presents the results of a study on the cross-sensitivity of MOX gas sensors toward ambient temperature and humidity. A gas sensor array consisting of temperature and humidity sensors and four different MOX gas sensors (MiCS-5524, GM-402B, GM-502B, and MiCS-6814) was developed. The sensors were subjected to various relative gas concentrations, temperatures (from 16◦C to 30◦C), and humidity levels (from 75% to 45%), representing a typical indoor environment. The results proved that the gas sensor responses were significantly affected by the temperature and humidity. The increased temperature and humidity levels led to a decreased response for all sensors, except for MiCS-6814, which showed the opposite response. Hence, this work proposed regression models for each sensor, which can correct the gas sensor response drift caused by the ambient temperature and humidity variations. The models were validated, and the standard deviations of the corrected sensor response were found to be 1.66 kΩ, 13.17 kΩ, 29.67 kΩ, and 0.12 kΩ, respectively. These values are much smaller compared to the raw sensor response (i.e., 18.22, 24.33 kΩ, 95.18 kΩ, and 2.99 kΩ), indicating that the model provided a more stable output and minimised the drift. Overall, the results also proved that the models can be used for MOX gas sensors employed in the training process, as well as for other sets of gas sensors. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. 
650 0 4 |a 3d linear regression 
650 0 4 |a 3D linear regression 
650 0 4 |a Chemical sensors 
650 0 4 |a Correction models 
650 0 4 |a Cost effectiveness 
650 0 4 |a Cross sensitivity 
650 0 4 |a cross-sensitivity 
650 0 4 |a drift correction 
650 0 4 |a Drift correction 
650 0 4 |a Gas detectors 
650 0 4 |a Gases 
650 0 4 |a Gas-sensors 
650 0 4 |a humidity 
650 0 4 |a Humidity levels 
650 0 4 |a Metal oxide sensors 
650 0 4 |a Metallic compounds 
650 0 4 |a Metal-oxides gas sensors 
650 0 4 |a Metals 
650 0 4 |a MOX sensors 
650 0 4 |a Regression analysis 
650 0 4 |a Sensor response 
650 0 4 |a temperature 
650 0 4 |a Temperature 
650 0 4 |a Temperature and humidities 
700 1 |a Abdullah, A.N.  |e author 
700 1 |a Adom, A.H.  |e author 
700 1 |a Bennetts, V.H.  |e author 
700 1 |a Juffry, Z.H.M.  |e author 
700 1 |a Kamarudin, K.  |e author 
700 1 |a Kamarudin, L.M.  |e author 
700 1 |a Mamduh, S.M.  |e author 
773 |t Sensors