Examining English Ability-Grouping Practices by Aligning CEFR Levels with University-Level General English Courses in Taiwan

In higher education in Taiwan, mandatory general English courses like Freshman English adopt ability-grouping practices to assign students to classes of different proficiency levels. However, little research has explored the efficacy of ability-grouping criteria and standardized the language-profici...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen, M.-C (Author), Chiu, C.-W (Author), Hsu, C.-C (Author), Yu, L.-T (Author), Yuan, Y.-P (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02068nam a2200229Ia 4500
001 10.3390-su14084629
008 220510s2022 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 20711050 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Examining English Ability-Grouping Practices by Aligning CEFR Levels with University-Level General English Courses in Taiwan 
260 0 |b MDPI  |c 2022 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084629 
520 3 |a In higher education in Taiwan, mandatory general English courses like Freshman English adopt ability-grouping practices to assign students to classes of different proficiency levels. However, little research has explored the efficacy of ability-grouping criteria and standardized the language-proficiency description for general English courses of different proficiency levels. Thus, this study recruited 806 Taiwanese undergraduates from Freshman English classes of advanced, intermediate, and basic proficiency levels to take the Oxford Online Placement Test (OOPT), and compared their scores on the Joint College Entrance Examination English subject (namely the General Scholastic Ability Test, GSAT) with OOPT. The findings indicated that the ability-grouping criterion was effective to classify students into three groups of different proficiency levels. A positive relationship between the GSAT and OOPT scores was identified. A clear trend, but with some overlapping correspondence, was displayed between the class levels and Common European Framework of Reference levels derived from the OOPT scoring report. Pedagogical implications and suggestions for future studies are provided. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. 
650 0 4 |a ability grouping 
650 0 4 |a Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) 
650 0 4 |a Freshman English classes 
650 0 4 |a General Scholastic Ability Test (GSAT) 
700 1 |a Chen, M.-C.  |e author 
700 1 |a Chiu, C.-W.  |e author 
700 1 |a Hsu, C.-C.  |e author 
700 1 |a Yu, L.-T.  |e author 
700 1 |a Yuan, Y.-P.  |e author 
773 |t Sustainability (Switzerland)