External Monitoring, ESG, and Information Content of Discretionary Accruals

Discretionary accruals reflect the management’s accounting choices made within the flexibility of accounting standards. Discretionary accruals can be used by the management to better reflect the economic value of the firm and to signal their private information about a firm’s future prospects to the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hong, K. (Author), Kim, J. (Author), Kwack, S.Y (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2022
Subjects:
ESG
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02296nam a2200217Ia 4500
001 10.3390-su14137599
008 220718s2022 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 20711050 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a External Monitoring, ESG, and Information Content of Discretionary Accruals 
260 0 |b MDPI  |c 2022 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137599 
520 3 |a Discretionary accruals reflect the management’s accounting choices made within the flexibility of accounting standards. Discretionary accruals can be used by the management to better reflect the economic value of the firm and to signal their private information about a firm’s future prospects to the market, but they can also be used opportunistically by managers. However, the prior literature documents mixed evidence related to the information content in discretionary accruals. Thus, we examine the association between discretionary accruals and analysts’ forecast dispersion to provide further evidence on the information content in discretionary accruals. Moreover, as greater external monitoring and rigorous ESG management allow less room for manager’s manipulation of discretionary accruals, we investigate whether greater external monitoring by institutional owners and higher ESG scores moderate the relationship between discretionary accruals and analysts’ disagreements on long-term EPS growth forecasts. We find a positive association between discretionary accruals and analysts’ forecast dispersion, which suggests there is low information content in discretionary accruals. Furthermore, we find that a greater concentration in institutional ownership, greater blockholders’ institutional ownership, and a positive ESG score mitigate the positive relationship between discretionary accruals and analysts’ forecast dispersion. Thus, better external monitoring and higher quality ESG enhance the information credibility of a firm’s disclosure. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. 
650 0 4 |a analyst forecast 
650 0 4 |a discretionary accruals 
650 0 4 |a ESG 
650 0 4 |a governance 
650 0 4 |a institutional ownership 
700 1 |a Hong, K.  |e author 
700 1 |a Kim, J.  |e author 
700 1 |a Kwack, S.Y.  |e author 
773 |t Sustainability (Switzerland)