A comparison of simple movement behaviors across three different devices

Reaching trajectories have provided a unique tool to observe changes in internal cognitive decisions. Furthermore, technological advances have made devices for measuring reach movements more accessible and researchers have recognized that various populations including children, elderly populations,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Moher, J. (Author), Song, J.-H (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer New York LLC 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 03129nam a2200505Ia 4500
001 10.3758-s13414-019-01856-8
008 220511s2019 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 19433921 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a A comparison of simple movement behaviors across three different devices 
260 0 |b Springer New York LLC  |c 2019 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01856-8 
520 3 |a Reaching trajectories have provided a unique tool to observe changes in internal cognitive decisions. Furthermore, technological advances have made devices for measuring reach movements more accessible and researchers have recognized that various populations including children, elderly populations, and non-human primates can easily execute simple movements as responses. As a result, devices such as a three-dimensional (3D) reach tracker, a stylus, or a computer-mouse have been increasingly utilized to study cognitive processes. However, although the specific type of tracking device that a researcher uses may impact behavior due to the constraints it places on movements, most researchers in these fields are unaware of this potential issue. Here, we examined the potential behavioral impact of using each of these three devices. To induce re-directed movements that mimic the movements that often occur following changes in cognitive states, we used a double-step task in which displacement of an initial target location requires participants to quickly re-direct their movement. We found that reach movement parameters were largely comparable across the three devices. However, hand movements measured by a 3D reach tracker showed earlier reach initiation latencies (relative to stylus movements) and more curved movement trajectories (relative to both mouse and stylus movements). Reach movements were also re-directed following target displacement more rapidly. Thus, 3D reach trackers may be ideal for observing fast, subtle changes in internal decision-making processes compared to other devices. Taken together, this study provides a useful reference for comparing and implementing reaching studies to examine human cognition. © 2019, The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 
650 0 4 |a animal 
650 0 4 |a Animals 
650 0 4 |a cognition 
650 0 4 |a Cognition 
650 0 4 |a comparative study 
650 0 4 |a decision making 
650 0 4 |a Decision Making 
650 0 4 |a Double-step 
650 0 4 |a female 
650 0 4 |a Female 
650 0 4 |a Goal-directed action 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a male 
650 0 4 |a Male 
650 0 4 |a Mice 
650 0 4 |a mouse 
650 0 4 |a Mouse 
650 0 4 |a Movement 
650 0 4 |a movement (physiology) 
650 0 4 |a Photic Stimulation 
650 0 4 |a photostimulation 
650 0 4 |a physiology 
650 0 4 |a procedures 
650 0 4 |a psychomotor performance 
650 0 4 |a Psychomotor Performance 
650 0 4 |a Reach movements 
650 0 4 |a Stylus 
650 0 4 |a young adult 
650 0 4 |a Young Adult 
700 1 |a Moher, J.  |e author 
700 1 |a Song, J.-H.  |e author 
773 |t Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics