Adding the keyword mnemonic to retrieval practice: A potent combination for foreign language vocabulary learning?

The keyword mnemonic and retrieval practice are two cognitive techniques that have each been identified to enhance foreign language vocabulary learning. However, little is known about the use of these techniques in combination. Previous demonstrations of retrieval-practice effects in foreign languag...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: McDaniel, M.A (Author), Miyatsu, T. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer New York LLC 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 03330nam a2200553Ia 4500
001 10.3758-s13421-019-00936-2
008 220511s2019 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 0090502X (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Adding the keyword mnemonic to retrieval practice: A potent combination for foreign language vocabulary learning? 
260 0 |b Springer New York LLC  |c 2019 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00936-2 
520 3 |a The keyword mnemonic and retrieval practice are two cognitive techniques that have each been identified to enhance foreign language vocabulary learning. However, little is known about the use of these techniques in combination. Previous demonstrations of retrieval-practice effects in foreign language vocabulary learning have tended to use several rounds of retrieval practice. In contrast, we focused on a situation in which retrieval practice was limited to twice per item. For this situation, it is unclear whether retrieval practice will be effective relative to restudying. We advance the view that the keyword mnemonic catalyzes the effectiveness of retrieval practice in this learning context. Experiment 1 (48-h delay) partially supported this view, such that there was no testing effect with retrieval practice alone, but the keyword-retrieval combination did not promote better retention than keyword alone. Experiments 2 and 3 (1-week delay) supported the catalytic view by showing that the keyword-retrieval combination was better than keyword alone, but in the absence of keyword encoding there was no retrieval practice effect (replicating Experiment 1). However, with four rounds of retrieval practice, a marginally significant testing effect emerged (Experiment 3). Moreover, the routes through which participants reached each answer were identified by asking retrieval-route questions in Experiments 2 and 3. Keyword-mediated retrieval, which was observed sometimes even in no-keyword instructed conditions, was shown to be more effective than unmediated retrieval. Our findings suggest that incorporating effective encoding techniques prior to retrieval practice could augment the effectiveness of retrieval practice, at least for vocabulary learning. © 2019, The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 
650 0 4 |a adult 
650 0 4 |a Adult 
650 0 4 |a aged 
650 0 4 |a Aged 
650 0 4 |a article 
650 0 4 |a catalysis 
650 0 4 |a female 
650 0 4 |a Female 
650 0 4 |a Foreign language vocabulary learning 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a human experiment 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a information retrieval 
650 0 4 |a language 
650 0 4 |a Language 
650 0 4 |a learning 
650 0 4 |a male 
650 0 4 |a Male 
650 0 4 |a Mental Recall 
650 0 4 |a middle aged 
650 0 4 |a Middle Aged 
650 0 4 |a paired associate learning 
650 0 4 |a Paired-Associate Learning 
650 0 4 |a Practice, Psychological 
650 0 4 |a recall 
650 0 4 |a Retrieval practice 
650 0 4 |a Testing effect 
650 0 4 |a The keyword mnemonic 
650 0 4 |a verbal learning 
650 0 4 |a Verbal Learning 
650 0 4 |a vocabulary 
650 0 4 |a Vocabulary 
650 0 4 |a young adult 
650 0 4 |a Young Adult 
700 1 |a McDaniel, M.A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Miyatsu, T.  |e author 
773 |t Memory and Cognition