The (un)reliability of item-level semantic priming effects

• Main Authors: Bruninx, A. (Author), Heyman, T. (Author), Hutchison, K.A (Author), Storms, G. (Author)
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Springer New York LLC 2018
• Subjects: adult; article; female; Female; human; Humans; male; Male; repetition priming; Repetition Priming; reproducibility; Reproducibility of Results; sample size; semantic memory; Semantic memory; Semantic priming; semantics; Semantics; Split-half reliability; test retest reliability; Test–retest reliability; young adult; Young Adult
• Online Access: View Fulltext in Publisher

 Many researchers have tried to predict semantic priming effects using a myriad of variables (e.g., prime–target associative strength or co-occurrence frequency). The idea is that relatedness varies across prime–target pairs, which should be reflected in the size of the priming effect (e.g., cat should prime dog more than animal does). However, it is only insightful to predict item-level priming effects if they can be measured reliably. Thus, in the present study we examined the split-half and test–retest reliabilities of item-level priming effects under conditions that should discourage the use of strategies. The resulting priming effects proved extremely unreliable, and reanalyses of three published priming datasets revealed similar cases of low reliability. These results imply that previous attempts to predict semantic priming were unlikely to be successful. However, one study with an unusually large sample size yielded more favorable reliability estimates, suggesting that big data, in terms of items and participants, should be the future for semantic priming research. © 2018, Psychonomic Society, Inc.