Effect of protective coating on microleakage of conventional glass ionomer cement and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in primary molars: An in vitro study

Aim: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the effect of protective coating G-Coat Plus on microleakage of conventional glass ionomer cement (CGIC) and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) in primary molars. Materials and Methods: A total of 120 samples were divided into...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Annamalai, S. (Author), Arthilakshmi (Author), Baghkomeh, P. (Author), DItto Sharmin, D. (Author), Vishnurekha, C. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02662nam a2200409Ia 4500
001 10.4103-ijdr.IJDR_490_17
008 220706s2018 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 09709290 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Effect of protective coating on microleakage of conventional glass ionomer cement and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in primary molars: An in vitro study 
260 0 |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications  |c 2018 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_490_17 
520 3 |a Aim: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the effect of protective coating G-Coat Plus on microleakage of conventional glass ionomer cement (CGIC) and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) in primary molars. Materials and Methods: A total of 120 samples were divided into four groups with 30 samples in each group. Group A - teeth restored with CGIC. Group B - teeth restored with CGIC coated with G-Coat Plus. Group C - teeth restored with RMGIC. Group D - teeth restored with RMGIC coated with G-Coat Plus. Microleakage was tested using 2% basic fuschin dye penetration and measured at ×40 original magnification under the stereomicroscope. Results: The results of this in vitro study showed that coating with G-Coat Plus showed a reduction in microleakage in CGIC and complete absence of microleakage in RMGIC when compared to the noncoated groups, which was statistically significant. CGIC without G-Coat Plus showed highest microleakage followed by RMGIC without G-Coat Plus, followed by a relatively less microleakage in CGIC with G-Coat Plus. Conclusion: Significant reduction in microleakage was seen in conventional GIC and RMGIC with G-Coat Plus when compared to conventional GIC and RMGIC without G-Coat Plus. © 2018 Indian Journal of Dental Research | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow. 
650 0 4 |a Conventional glass ionomer cement 
650 0 4 |a deciduous tooth 
650 0 4 |a Dental Leakage 
650 0 4 |a G-Coat Plus 
650 0 4 |a glass ionomer 
650 0 4 |a Glass Ionomer Cements 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a in vitro study 
650 0 4 |a In Vitro Techniques 
650 0 4 |a microleakage 
650 0 4 |a Molar 
650 0 4 |a molar tooth 
650 0 4 |a primary molars 
650 0 4 |a resin 
650 0 4 |a resin-modified glass ionomer cement 
650 0 4 |a Resins, Synthetic 
650 0 4 |a tooth disease 
650 0 4 |a Tooth, Deciduous 
700 1 |a Annamalai, S.  |e author 
700 1 |a Arthilakshmi  |e author 
700 1 |a Baghkomeh, P.  |e author 
700 1 |a DItto Sharmin, D.  |e author 
700 1 |a Vishnurekha, C.  |e author 
773 |t Indian Journal of Dental Research