|
|
|
|
LEADER |
02662nam a2200409Ia 4500 |
001 |
10.4103-ijdr.IJDR_490_17 |
008 |
220706s2018 CNT 000 0 und d |
020 |
|
|
|a 09709290 (ISSN)
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Effect of protective coating on microleakage of conventional glass ionomer cement and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in primary molars: An in vitro study
|
260 |
|
0 |
|b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
|c 2018
|
856 |
|
|
|z View Fulltext in Publisher
|u https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_490_17
|
520 |
3 |
|
|a Aim: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the effect of protective coating G-Coat Plus on microleakage of conventional glass ionomer cement (CGIC) and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) in primary molars. Materials and Methods: A total of 120 samples were divided into four groups with 30 samples in each group. Group A - teeth restored with CGIC. Group B - teeth restored with CGIC coated with G-Coat Plus. Group C - teeth restored with RMGIC. Group D - teeth restored with RMGIC coated with G-Coat Plus. Microleakage was tested using 2% basic fuschin dye penetration and measured at ×40 original magnification under the stereomicroscope. Results: The results of this in vitro study showed that coating with G-Coat Plus showed a reduction in microleakage in CGIC and complete absence of microleakage in RMGIC when compared to the noncoated groups, which was statistically significant. CGIC without G-Coat Plus showed highest microleakage followed by RMGIC without G-Coat Plus, followed by a relatively less microleakage in CGIC with G-Coat Plus. Conclusion: Significant reduction in microleakage was seen in conventional GIC and RMGIC with G-Coat Plus when compared to conventional GIC and RMGIC without G-Coat Plus. © 2018 Indian Journal of Dental Research | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow.
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Conventional glass ionomer cement
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a deciduous tooth
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Dental Leakage
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a G-Coat Plus
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a glass ionomer
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Glass Ionomer Cements
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a human
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Humans
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a in vitro study
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a In Vitro Techniques
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a microleakage
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Molar
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a molar tooth
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a primary molars
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a resin
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a resin-modified glass ionomer cement
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Resins, Synthetic
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a tooth disease
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Tooth, Deciduous
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Annamalai, S.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Arthilakshmi
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Baghkomeh, P.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a DItto Sharmin, D.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Vishnurekha, C.
|e author
|
773 |
|
|
|t Indian Journal of Dental Research
|