Comparative analysis of sagittal condylar guidance recorded by intraoral gothic arch tracing and panoramic radiograph in completely edentulous patients

Aim: To compare the intraoral gothic tracing method with panoramic radiographs in patients requiring complete dentures. Materials and methods: The present study was conducted on 20 edentulous subjects of both genders. Hanau Wide-Vue semi-adjustable articulator was used to record sagittal condylar gu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chaudhary, N. (Author), Kumar, N. (Author), Malhotra, A. (Author), Singhal, N. (Author), Sirana, P. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 03182nam a2200469Ia 4500
001 10.5005-jp-journals-10024-2422
008 220706s2018 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 15263711 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Comparative analysis of sagittal condylar guidance recorded by intraoral gothic arch tracing and panoramic radiograph in completely edentulous patients 
260 0 |b Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd  |c 2018 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2422 
520 3 |a Aim: To compare the intraoral gothic tracing method with panoramic radiographs in patients requiring complete dentures. Materials and methods: The present study was conducted on 20 edentulous subjects of both genders. Hanau Wide-Vue semi-adjustable articulator was used to record sagittal condylar guidance in all patients. Panoramic radiographs were taken in all patients and Frankfurt horizontal plane was traced on both sides of orthopantomogram (OPG) and second plane was marked by joining the most superior and most inferior point on the glenoid fossa curvature. Frankfort's horizontal plane was crossed with this line to record radiographic condylar guidance angle. NNT software was used to record the condylar guidance angle. Results: Mean ± standard deviation (SD) clinical SCG (25.15 ± 3.24) and radiographic seismocardiography (SCG) (27.54± 5.01) was non significant (p > 0.05) on left side. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) clinical SCG (26.84 ± 3.69) and radiographic SCG (29.3 5 ± 4.58) was significant (p < 0.05) on right side. The SCG did not show difference in values recorded by both methods on both sides. The difference in values in both sides by clinical method and radiographic method was non-significant (p > 0.05). Conclusion: There was correlation between sagittal condylar guidance obtained by both intraoral gothic arch method as well as radiographic method done on digital panoramic radiographs. Clinical significance: Correct centric jaw relation determines the success of the complete denture. Radiographic and clinical methods provide sufficient minute details necessary for the betterment of management. © Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. 
650 0 4 |a comparative study 
650 0 4 |a complete denture 
650 0 4 |a Denture, Complete 
650 0 4 |a diagnostic imaging 
650 0 4 |a female 
650 0 4 |a Female 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a Intraoral gothic arch 
650 0 4 |a jaw relation record 
650 0 4 |a Jaw Relation Record 
650 0 4 |a male 
650 0 4 |a Male 
650 0 4 |a mandible condyle 
650 0 4 |a Mandibular Condyle 
650 0 4 |a mouth disease 
650 0 4 |a Mouth, Edentulous 
650 0 4 |a Panoramic radiographs 
650 0 4 |a panoramic radiography 
650 0 4 |a procedures 
650 0 4 |a Radiography, Dental 
650 0 4 |a Radiography, Panoramic 
650 0 4 |a Sagittal condylar guidance 
650 0 4 |a tooth radiography 
700 1 |a Chaudhary, N.  |e author 
700 1 |a Kumar, N.  |e author 
700 1 |a Malhotra, A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Singhal, N.  |e author 
700 1 |a Sirana, P.  |e author 
773 |t Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice