The myth of multitasking and what it means for future pharmacists

Objective. The primary purposes of this study were to determine the extent to which multitasking affects the speed and accuracy with which Doctor of Pharmacy students identify prescription errors and whether there is a relationship between students’ self-perception of their multitasking ability and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Enz, S. (Author), Hall, A.C.G (Author), Williams, K.K (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 03119nam a2200469Ia 4500
001 10.5688-ajpe8267
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 00029459 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a The myth of multitasking and what it means for future pharmacists 
260 0 |b American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8267 
520 3 |a Objective. The primary purposes of this study were to determine the extent to which multitasking affects the speed and accuracy with which Doctor of Pharmacy students identify prescription errors and whether there is a relationship between students’ self-perception of their multitasking ability and their actual ability. Methods. One hundred twenty-one second-year pharmacy students enrolled in the required course Introduction to Dosage Forms spent one week in an experimental (multitasking) condition and one week in a control (undistracted) condition. Subjects were given 10 minutes to check 10 prescriptions and record any identified filling errors. A cellular phone was placed in each room. Subjects in the experimental (multitasking) condition answered a call from a researcher posing as a talkative customer during the prescription-checking task while subjects in the control condition were not interrupted by a cell phone call during the task. Subjects’ completion times and accuracy were recorded. Results. When subjects were multitasking, they took significantly longer to complete the prescriptionchecking task than when they were not multitasking. Furthermore, when subjects were multitasking, they scored significantly lower on the prescription-checking task than when they were not multitasking. Finally, students’ self-perceptions of their multitasking abilities were not related to the speed with which they completed the prescription-checking task nor to their accuracy. Conclusion. Multitasking negatively affects speed and accuracy of prescription verification in student pharmacists. Our procedure can be used as an in-class activity to demonstrate the limits of attention and to shape how future pharmacists practice. © 2021, American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy. All rights reserved. 
650 0 4 |a adult 
650 0 4 |a article 
650 0 4 |a attention 
650 0 4 |a cell phone use 
650 0 4 |a Cellular phone use 
650 0 4 |a Distractions 
650 0 4 |a drug dosage form 
650 0 4 |a education 
650 0 4 |a Education, Pharmacy 
650 0 4 |a female 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a human experiment 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a male 
650 0 4 |a Multitasking 
650 0 4 |a perception 
650 0 4 |a pharmacist 
650 0 4 |a Pharmacists 
650 0 4 |a pharmacy practice 
650 0 4 |a pharmacy student 
650 0 4 |a pharmacy student 
650 0 4 |a prescription 
650 0 4 |a Prescriptions 
650 0 4 |a Sterile cockpit 
650 0 4 |a Students, Pharmacy 
650 0 4 |a velocity 
700 1 |a Enz, S.  |e author 
700 1 |a Hall, A.C.G.  |e author 
700 1 |a Williams, K.K.  |e author 
773 |t American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education