A bibliometric analysis of peer-reviewed journal publications of pharmacy practice department chairs

• Main Authors: Baker, W.L (Author), Brown, R.E (Author), Dixon, D.L (Author), Koenig, R.A (Author), Sobieraj, D.M (Author), Wagner, M. (Author)
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy 2021
• Subjects: adult; article; bibliometrics; Bibliometrics; Chair; controlled study; education; Education, Pharmacy; Faculty; female; Female; human; Humans; male; Male; Pharmacy; pharmacy (shop); pharmacy practice; pharmacy school; productivity; Publications; Schools, Pharmacy; Scopus; systematic review; university
• Online Access: View Fulltext in Publisher

 Objective. To perform a bibliometric analysis of pharmacy practice department chairs at US schools and colleges of pharmacy to determine factors associated with their level of scholarly productivity. Methods. Scopus was searched for all publications by pharmacy practice chairs from all pharmacy schools through August 11, 2020. Publication metrics (total number of publications and citations and the Hirsch-index (h-index), and year of first publication), as well as characteristics of the individual chair and institution were collected. Characteristics were compared across groups. A generalized linear model was used to determine the correlation between the total number of publications and h-index to school ranking by US News & World Report (USNWR). Results. One hundred forty-one pharmacy practice chairs were identified. The majority were male and at the rank of professor, with a similar proportion from public and private institutions. The median total number of publications and citations was 19 and 247, respectively, with a median h-index of eight. Compared with female chairs, male chairs had a higher median total of publications and citations and a higher h-index. Chairs at public institutions had a higher median total of publications and citations and a higher publication rate, h-index, and m quotient. The USNWR ranking for the school was significantly correlated with total publications and the h-index. Conclusion. Pharmacy practice chairs vary significantly in their scholarship productivity, although those at institutions with a larger emphasis on research were more prolific. Observed differences in the publication metrics of male and female chairs warrants further study to determine possible explanations for this finding and its potential impact. © 2021 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy.