Rating mean of expert judges and asymmetric confidence intervals in content validity: An SPSS syntax
The estimation of content validity, obtained by rational analysis of expert judges, is usually done with coefficients that standardize between 0.0 and 1.0 the judges' judgment. However, this estimate can also be ex-pressed in the metric of the judges' responses, in the form of the response...
Main Authors: | Livia-Segovia, J. (Author), Merino-Soto, C. (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidad de Murcia Servicio de Publicaciones
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | View Fulltext in Publisher |
Similar Items
-
Cross-cultural content validation of a modified service quality questionnaire in Kannada
by: Savithra Prakash, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Using Item Mapping to Evaluate Alignment between Curriculum and Assessment
by: Kaira, Leah Tepelunde
Published: (2010) -
Création d'un modèle de valeurs de travail avec items validés auprès d'experts du domaine de l'orientation
by: Busque-Carrier, Mathieu
Published: (2015) -
Content Validation through Expert Judgement of an Instrument on the Nutritional Knowledge, Beliefs, and Habits of Pregnant Women
by: Elisabet Fernández-Gómez, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01) -
Initial development of a patient-reported outcome measure of experience with cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia
by: Welch LC, et al.
Published: (2017-06-01)