Can schools promote the health of children with asthma?

This report describes the evaluation of a whole-school intervention to improve morbidity and psychosocial well-being in pupils with asthma. In all, 193 children with asthma (7-9 years) from 23 primary/junior schools in the south of England participated. Schools (n = 12) randomly assigned to the inte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mcwhirter, Jenny M. (Author), McCann, Donna C. (Author), Coleman, Helen (Author), Calvert, Marguerite (Author), Warner, John O. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2008-03-05.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 02007 am a22001693u 4500
001 145995
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Mcwhirter, Jenny M.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a McCann, Donna C.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Coleman, Helen  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Calvert, Marguerite  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Warner, John O.  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Can schools promote the health of children with asthma? 
260 |c 2008-03-05. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/145995/1/4.__Can_schools_promote_the_health_of_children_with_asthma.pdf 
520 |a This report describes the evaluation of a whole-school intervention to improve morbidity and psychosocial well-being in pupils with asthma. In all, 193 children with asthma (7-9 years) from 23 primary/junior schools in the south of England participated. Schools (n = 12) randomly assigned to the intervention group (IV) received a staff asthma training session, advice on asthma policy and practice and an emergency ?2-agonist inhaler with spacer. Pupils participated in an asthma lesson. Staff and pupils in non-intervention (NI) schools (n = 11) received no asthma-oriented input. While wheeze reports improved for all children with asthma, only the IV group showed lower requirement for medication (P = 0.01), clinically significant improvement (P < 0.05) in activity related quality of life (QOL) and increased self-esteem (SE: social P = 0.01; athletic P = 0.05; behaviour P = 0.001) in girls. SE decreased for NI girls but there was no change for non-asthmatic peers in NI or IV schools which had similar baseline levels of SE and QOL. There was a marginal improvement in the establishment of asthma policies/practices and no change in school absence or staff knowledge. The significantly increased peer group understanding of asthma seen in the intervention schools may have mediated increased well-being in the IV group. Primary schools are a potentially important context for improving asthma morbidity and psychosocial well-being of children with asthma. 
655 7 |a Article