How legitimate is the open method of coordination?
This article argues that the OMC's legitimacy can be improved only by strengthening parliamentary channels of input-legitimacy since output-legitimacy alone is inappropriate and cannot be achieved without input-legitimacy. In addition, concepts and practices of direct 'stakeholder' pa...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2008-09.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get fulltext |
| LEADER | 00714 am a22001213u 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 150777 | ||
| 042 | |a dc | ||
| 100 | 1 | 0 | |a Büchs, Milena |e author |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a How legitimate is the open method of coordination? |
| 260 | |c 2008-09. | ||
| 856 | |z Get fulltext |u https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/150777/1/jcms_804_poofs_June_2008.pdf | ||
| 520 | |a This article argues that the OMC's legitimacy can be improved only by strengthening parliamentary channels of input-legitimacy since output-legitimacy alone is inappropriate and cannot be achieved without input-legitimacy. In addition, concepts and practices of direct 'stakeholder' participation currently applied within the OMC are insufficient in strengthening input-legitimacy. | ||
| 655 | 7 | |a Article | |