Quantifying self-motives: functional links between dispositional desires

Previous research has sought to establish the existence, or gauge the relative strength, of key self-evaluation motives (i.e., self-enhancement, self-verification, self-assessment, self-improvement). Here, we attempted, across five samples, to quantify individual differences in self-motive strength,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gregg, Aiden P. (Author), Hepper, Erica G. (Author), Sedikides, Constantine (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2011-12.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01428 am a22001453u 4500
001 183853
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Gregg, Aiden P.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Hepper, Erica G.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sedikides, Constantine  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Quantifying self-motives: functional links between dispositional desires 
260 |c 2011-12. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/183853/1/Gregg_Hepper_Sedikides_Self-Motives_2011.docx-1.docx 
520 |a Previous research has sought to establish the existence, or gauge the relative strength, of key self-evaluation motives (i.e., self-enhancement, self-verification, self-assessment, self-improvement). Here, we attempted, across five samples, to quantify individual differences in self-motive strength, and explore their empirical ramifications. We devised brief self-report indices for each self-motive, and checked their factor structure, reliability, and validity. We found that self-enhancement covaried mainly with self-verification, and that self-assessment covaried mainly with self-improvement, thus validating key hypotheses regarding their functional links. Moreover, self-enhancement and self-verification covaried with positive personality traits, as well as with preferences for receiving positive feedback and perceptions of its accuracy. In sum, self-reported variations in dispositional self-motive strength form theoretically meaningful patterns. 
655 7 |a Article