Time orientation and health-related behaviour: measurement in general population samples

Research on health behaviour and time orientation has been hindered by a lack of consensus about appropriate measurement. Study 1 assessed the reliability of the Consideration of Future Consequences Scale (CFC) and the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI) in a general population sample (n = 30...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Crockett, Rachel A. (Author), Weinman, John (Author), Hankins, Matthew (Author), Marteau, Theresa (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2009-03.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01428 am a22001573u 4500
001 187339
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Crockett, Rachel A.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Weinman, John  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Hankins, Matthew  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Marteau, Theresa  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Time orientation and health-related behaviour: measurement in general population samples 
260 |c 2009-03. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/187339/1/Time_orientation_and_health-related_behaviour.pdf 
520 |a Research on health behaviour and time orientation has been hindered by a lack of consensus about appropriate measurement. Study 1 assessed the reliability of the Consideration of Future Consequences Scale (CFC) and the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI) in a general population sample (n = 300). Although more reliable, the CFC was less readable. Study 2 assessed the validity of a shortened ZTPI, measuring future and present orientation, and the full CFC. The measures had good discrimination to distinguish interpersonal differences. Construct validity of present, but not future, orientation as measured by the ZTPI, was evidenced by its mediation of the association between socioeconomic status and expectations of participating in diabetes screening. The CFC mediated this relationship more weakly. Further investigation of present orientation in understanding health-related behaviour is warranted 
655 7 |a Article