|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01487 am a22001573u 4500 |
| 001 |
356074 |
| 042 |
|
|
|a dc
|
| 100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Gebauer, J.E.
|e author
|
| 700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Nehrlich, A.D.
|e author
|
| 700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Sedikides, C.
|e author
|
| 700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Neberich, W.
|e author
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a The psychological benefits of income are contingent on individual-level and culture-level religiosity
|
| 260 |
|
|
|c 2013-08-06.
|
| 856 |
|
|
|z Get fulltext
|u https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/356074/1/Gebauer%2520Nehrlich%2520Sedikides%2520%2520Neberich%25202013.docx
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Higher income is related to better psychological adjustment. We propose that religiosity attenuates this relation. First, in comforting the poor, religious teachings de-emphasize the importance of money, which would buffer low-income's psychological harms (religiosity as poverty buffer account). Second, religious teachings convey antiwealth norms, which would reduce income's psychological benefits (religiosity as antiwealth norms account). A study involving 187,957 respondents from 11 religiously diverse cultures showed that individual-level, as well as culture-level, religiosity weakens the relation between personal income and psychological adjustment in accordance with the religiosity as antiwealth norms account. Performance self-esteem mediated this relation. Religiosity's moderating effects were so pervasive that religious individuals in religious cultures reported better psychological adjustment when their income was low than high.
|
| 655 |
7 |
|
|a Article
|
